I think you should try to find any credibility that supports the idea of loops in the first instance. I have not found any. I can see that they were kind of created
here on PerC in 2010 but they are all attributed to various mental disorders and I do not know if the author of the post is qualified enough to do that with any credibility.
There is also the problem of the orientation of the tertiary function which according to the MBTI manual and also following Jungs theories is actually in opposite direction to the dominant function so the loop theory is inconsistent with MBTI. The loop theory is fake for these reasons and more.
In my opinion Te-Se denotes an ordinary ESTJ* and Se-Te denotes an ordinary ESTP* because it shows the preferred attitude is Extroversion and I think the preferred attitude fades from E to I in E types as the functions drop in consciousness levels so it would look like Te-Se-Ni-Fi for the ESTJ, where Se is mostly conscious but still a little unconscious, and Ni is mostly conscious but still a little conscious. Te is most conscious and Fi is most unconscious obviously. This is just how I see it. I do not think that preferring Thinking over Feeling (therefore "Te" over "Se") means you are somehow really a Feeling type and have an auxiliary "Fi". If you prefer T, you are a T in my opinion. To believe in the "loop" theory you have to agree with a lot of things that are inconsistent and do not make any sense.
The Te-Se/Se-Te paragraph from the link I provided earlier is this:
I have some questions:
- What proof is there that someone preferring "Te/Se" or "Se/Te" has OCPD?
- Where is the support for "Te/Se" or "Se/Te" preferring Type 8 Enneagram?
- Why is there an assumption that they require approval of others internally more than they let on?
- Why is "Fi/Ni" attributed to considering the effects your actions have
on others?
For some background on OCPD
this has some information regarding the signs for diagnosis. It seems to work in theory for an MBTI xSTJ (Te/Si or Si/Te) taken too far (Hyperfocus on details. Forgets the point/big picture. Extreme devotion to production, perfection and work. Rigid and stubborn). I am not a psychologist so dismiss this if you would like.
I am just trying to say that I think the "loops" are nonsense for a variety of reasons.