SJs: Can you romantically in love with more than one person?

SJs: Can you romantically in love with more than one person?

Hello Guest! Sign up to join the discussion below...
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
Thank Tree91Thanks

This is a discussion on SJs: Can you romantically in love with more than one person? within the SJ's Temperament Forum- The Overseers forums, part of the Keirsey Temperament Forums category; I have this 2 friends. One girl and one guy. Lets just say their name is Anna and Andy. Anna ...

  1. #1
    ESTJ - The Guardians

    SJs: Can you romantically in love with more than one person?

    I have this 2 friends. One girl and one guy. Lets just say their name is Anna and Andy.

    Anna is a very beautiful girl and she has many admirer. One day she involved with 5 guys who likes her. I told her to pick one, but she refused. She said she fall in love with ALL of them. So those guys finally found out that she's involved with all of them. One by one left her and dates another girl. I saw how Anna got hurt and broken hearted every time she finds out that one of those guys is dating another girl. And things kept repeating. Currently she is having relationship with 3 guys. And like always, she refused to choose one because she said she love them ALL. Plus, she always said that she's still in love with her exes. Each one of them.

    Andy had this relationship with one girl. Then the girl broke up with him. Now Andy has another girlfriend. But he still keep in touch with his ex. Now his ex wanted to come back, and Andy told me he was confused because he loves BOTH of his ex and his current gf. He doesn't want to choose.

    Personally, I couldn't understand how someone can love more than a person, romantically, at the same time. When I'm romantically in love with a person, there's no other room in my heart for another person. When I said I'm romantically in love with you, you can be sure that I'm only saying that to you.

    Also, when I broke up with my ex, my love for him will gradually disappear. When I have a crush on a guy and then I find out he's in a relationship with someone else, my feelings for him will also gone. Short to say, I just can't love what I can't have.

    So, if I'm Andy, I will choose my current gf and I will have no more romantic feelings for my ex, even if I still care about her. If I'm Anna, I'll choose one bf at a time.

    SJs, what about you? Can you romantically in love with more than one person? Can you love a person which you can't have (i.e someone whose already married or in a relationship with another person)? Can you love a person who said he/she is romantically in love with you, but also in love with another person(s)?


    Seamaid and snapdragons thanked this post.



  2. #2
    INFJ - The Protectors

    I'm the same as you, if I give my heart to one person it would be that just one person.

    And if I do have a crush on someone and then find out they're involved, then I most likely will gradually lose interest. Although I wouldn't rule out that all the time, sometimes that attraction will be there but I wouldn't do anything about it because I'm not the type of person to break up a relationship - I put myself in the woman's shoes and think how hurt they would be, just because I wouldn't want to be treated like that, and I've been in that position before and it is painful....the betrayal.

  3. #3
    ISFP


    "Can you be romantically in love with more than 1 person?" It's possible but not very likely.
    Feelings are feelings and they can be tricky. As with Andys case.
    I can understand his POV and I think it must be a very confusing situation. It's perfectly possible to love more than 1 person, even romantically. But not very likely, at least not for me (romantically that is. ).
    There is room for but 1 partner unless something extra-ordinary happens. Like the x-effect in Andys case. Then it gets messy. But I would likely choose 1 and stick to it before the triangle drama ensues..

    Anna is totally not cool! That's too extreme, how can she do that?

    "Can you love a person which you can't have (i.e someone whose already married or in a relationship with another person)? Can you love a person who said he/she is romantically in love with you, but also in love with another person(s)?"
    Yes-yes, it's possible. But not plausible.
    As I mentioned before feelings are feelings, though I doubt I would ever put myself in such a situation. I don't follow all my feelings and impulses blindly. Brain+heart is key

    Also some people are like swans, they have 1 big love and stick to it. Even if it means to be alone for the rest of their lives, or a long period of time. I find it admirable and also a bit sad.
    WickedQueen, Wake, Seamaid and 2 others thanked this post.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PersonalityCafe.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    ENTJ - The Executives

    it is REALLY difficult for me to really like more than one person at once. It's uncomfortable for me to be in that situation ; I generally have one track minds and am very content with that. I don't like other people approaching me with their interest in me when I'm involved with someone else. And I would like my partner to also be that way.

    I like monogamy a lot.
    WickedQueen, Wake, Seamaid and 3 others thanked this post.

  6. #5
    Unknown Personality


    Quote Originally Posted by WickedQueen View Post


    SJs, what about you? Can you romantically in love with more than one person? Can you love a person which you can't have (i.e someone whose already married or in a relationship with another person)? Can you love a person who said he/she is romantically in love with you, but also in love with another person(s)?
    I could never romantically be involved with more than one person. Logic would stop me loving a person i am not allowed to be with and also it would go against my principles.

    Your final question is a little more trickier.
    WickedQueen, Wake, Seamaid and 1 others thanked this post.

  7. #6
    ISFJ - The Nurturers

    Love is a social construct. It is different for each person, and if you believe you can love more than one person, more power to you. I'm happy for everyone who loves their one special person, but I'm also happy for those who have enough love in their minds and hearts to love more than one person equally.

    As a side note - can you really say that you can only love one person? I'm assuming that you mean that you can only romantically love one person. Surely most of you love your mom/dad/brother/sister/dog. And you love each of them to the best of your ability. Why is there a limit to romantic love, but not to familial love? There's only a limit because society teaches that it is abhorrent and wrong to love more than one person. Society teaches us that love is between two people, and two people only - anything else is a crime. These same societal rules tell us that we can't allow same-sex couples, that's a crime too. These societal rules also tell us that it's not so cool for a white person to love a black person. I'm willing to bet that a lot of people here don't agree with THOSE societal rules. Why is it okay to break those rules, but not the rule on monogamy? I don't agree with this. You can love however many people you want, and whomever you want.

    The more you realize how society shapes your beliefs/values/customs the more you can separate yourself from it and really soul search to see if you agree with the rules that your world has imposed on you. So really, do you believe that it's only okay for one person to love one and only one other person? Even if it's what you want, would you impose this rule on others? Take away their freedoms? I hope not.
    Seamaid, Singularity, tehTerminator and 4 others thanked this post.

  8. #7
    ESTJ - The Guardians

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady K View Post
    Love is a social construct.
    I disagree. I think love is a natural desire that everyone has. It has little, if not nothing, to do with social construct. Ancient history clearly proves that the homosexual practice is not a new term. Everyone knows that Alexander The Great was bisexual, for example.

    As a side note - can you really say that you can only love one person? I'm assuming that you mean that you can only romantically love one person.
    Yes. Apparently you didn't read my question clearly.
    Can you romantically in love with more than one person?


    There's only a limit because society teaches that it is abhorrent and wrong to love more than one person. Society teaches us that love is between two people, and two people only - anything else is a crime.
    Not all societal rules teach that. There's a lot of countries and cultures that allows polygamy, which is basically allows one person (male) to have many wives. What societal rules are you talking about?

    Why is it okay to break those rules, but not the rule on monogamy? I don't agree with this. You can love however many people you want, and whomever you want.

    The more you realize how society shapes your beliefs/values/customs the more you can separate yourself from it and really soul search to see if you agree with the rules that your world has imposed on you. So really, do you believe that it's only okay for one person to love one and only one other person? Even if it's what you want, would you impose this rule on others? Take away their freedoms? I hope not.
    My question is not whether you agree or disagree with monogamy. My question is simply, if I must repeat:
    Can you romantically in love with more than one person? Can you love a person which you can't have (i.e someone whose already married or in a relationship with another person)? Can you love a person who said he/she is romantically in love with you, but also in love with another person(s)?

    The purpose of those questions is to seek the correlation between SJs, who are commonly known as the most loyal type from all the MBTI types.

    Wake, Seamaid, Lady K and 1 others thanked this post.

  9. #8
    ISFJ - The Nurturers

    To want love and to feel love is a natural desire. What love is to a culture, a group of people, is a social construct. Love is different for people in the US than it is for people in a country that practices and condones polygamy. Some countries don't consider love at all in things like marriage. In the US, love is considered a typical reason for marriage - hence it becomes a social construct. I apologize for not being clearer.

    And you're right, I didn't read your post clearly enough, I skimmed it because your grammar is very poor in some sections and it hurts my brain to translate into proper English. :) I think it's fair to say that my point still stands. We don't divide up our familial love and decide that we love one family member more than another. Why do we HAVE to only have enough love for one romantic relationship? (Per US dominant culture, of course!) Seems kind of silly to me. Like we have a bag of love and the one for our moms and dads and sisters and brothers is unlimited, but the one for our boyfriend or girlfriend is only so full. What happens to the limited love when we give it to someone and then the relationship fails? Does that love that we gave them disappear? Do we have less love to give to our next partner? I feel that saying that people can/should only love one person romantically is like saying you can measure love. That's all I meant.

    I also wasn't really answering your questions, I was questioning the responses of others mostly because this thread is similar to another that exists in another part of this forum, and I find it interesting that most, if not all people agree that anything other than monogamy is "disgusting."

    And I'm also unsure of why you brought up homosexuals from ancient Greece. What does this have to do with monogamy, or even love? Are you meaning that love isn't a social construct because men fucked other men in ancient times? That point doesn't make any sense - society was just different back then. Though yes, I did know that homosexuality and bisexuality are ancient practices. Thanks for reminding me of something that any educated and open-minded person knows. ^.^

    And sorry! U.S. dominant culture, of course. I know very well that all cultures are not the same. It's cute that you think I'm a bigot though.

    The purpose of those questions is to seek the correlation between SJs, who are commonly known as the most loyal type from all the MBTI types.


    The purpose of my post was to point out that people should reconsider their views on love because I don't believe that polygamy should be looked at so negatively. I apologize for not staying on track with your subject.

    Also.. are you trying to imply that to be loyal you must only be in love with one person? Meaning you think that most SJs will not agree with polyamory because they have a sense of loyalty? Hm, interesting.

    To actually answer your question though, and get your panties untwisted - I believe that I am fully capable of being in a polygamist relationship, whether it be multiple women and one man, multiple women and myself, or myself and multiple men. I am actually in a polygamist relationship with two bisexual males, and it is one of the most rewarding experiences of my life. :)

    As a side note, you're very rude, and I'm sure you understand my response in kind to such rudeness. Have a nice day.

    WickedQueen, tehTerminator, Trinidad and 2 others thanked this post.

  10. #9
    ESTJ - The Guardians

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady K View Post
    To want love and to feel love is a natural desire. What love is to a culture, a group of people, is a social construct.
    Again, I must disagree. Your opinion suggest that people are easily shaped by their social rules. But social rules itself was build based on individuals opinion that became a major opinion. So social rules basically comes from the desire of most individuals in the group.

    Love is different for people in the US than it is for people in a country that practices and condones polygamy. Some countries don't consider love at all in things like marriage. In the US, love is considered a typical reason for marriage - hence it becomes a social construct. I apologize for not being clearer.
    Are you suggesting that people who practices polygamy doesn't consider love at all in marriage? If yes, then I must disagree. Polygamy is one of the example how society support the term of loving more than a person when it comes to romance.

    And as far as I know, your country is against it. This proves that most of people in your country does not agree with the term of loving more than a person. I'm not saying that it's right or wrong, but it is the fact that majority of the people prefer one on one relationship
    when it comes to romance.

    Is doing the opposite means wrong? I never said that. I simply stated that I'm not a fan of it and I'm curious to know if other SJs has the similar statement. That is why I made this thread.


    And you're right, I didn't read your post clearly enough, I skimmed it because your grammar is very poor in some sections and it hurts my brain to translate into proper English. :)
    I'm sorry. English is not my mother tongue and I can't afford to take English course, so I use international forum to practice my English autodidactly.

    I think it's fair to say that my point still stands.
    I understand that, but your first post in this thread doesn't really answer my questions and had potential to derailing the thread. So I was trying to steer the conversation to the main subject.

    We don't divide up our familial love and decide that we love one family member more than another. Why do we HAVE to only have enough love for one romantic relationship? (Per US dominant culture, of course!)
    As I said earlier, I don't think romantically in love with more than a person is something that everyone MUST do, since many people practice polygamy since more than thousands of years ago. It means many people do that, so it's not necessarily the wrong thing. My questions in the OP is clear: CAN you romantically in love with more than a person? It's a question about a person's ability to love more than one person (because I'm not able to do so), it's not about whether it's right or wrong, or whether it's make sense or not.

    Seems kind of silly to me.
    I wouldn't say that. For most people, a marriage ideally involving two person. Is it silly if we only able to love a person and wanting the same thing from our partner? I don't think so. I think, for most people, romantic love is about being equal and fair in love, but in the same time also indulging our selfishness to have the whole love only for ourselves and vice versa.

    Like we have a bag of love and the one for our moms and dads and sisters and brothers is unlimited, but the one for our boyfriend or girlfriend is only so full.
    What's wrong with that?

    What happens to the limited love when we give it to someone and then the relationship fails? Does that love that we gave them disappear?
    For me, yes. Like I said in the OP, I can't love what I can't have.

    Do we have less love to give to our next partner?
    No, because what is left from the past for me is just memories. My love will remain complete for my next partner.

    I feel that saying that people can/should only love one person romantically is like saying you can measure love. That's all I meant.
    I understand. And I disagree.

    I also wasn't really answering your questions, I was questioning the responses of others mostly because this thread is similar to another that exists in another part of this forum, and I find it interesting that most, if not all people agree that anything other than monogamy is "disgusting."
    I know what thread you're referring to. But you should know that what others think about some issue, whether you agree or not, is none of your business. You may argue, you may questioning, but you shouldn't judge.

    And I'm also unsure of why you brought up homosexuals from ancient Greece. What does this have to do with monogamy, or even love? Are you meaning that love isn't a social construct because men fucked other men in ancient times?
    Exactly.

    That point doesn't make any sense - society was just different back then.
    Ancient society was even crueler about homosexuality. I was referring to ancient society because my point is, even in the most cruel era, homosexual and bisexual was still arise, proved that love is not a social construct.

    Though yes, I did know that homosexuality and bisexuality are ancient practices. Thanks for reminding me of something that any educated and open-minded person knows. ^.^
    And sorry! U.S. dominant culture, of course. I know very well that all cultures are not the same. It's cute that you think I'm a bigot though
    I'm surprise with your respond. I think you're over perceiving my words.

    Also.. are you trying to imply that to be loyal you must only be in love with one person?
    Meaning you think that most SJs will not agree with polyamory because they have a sense of loyalty? Hm, interesting.
    No. Once again, you're over perceiving my questions. I'm asking the questions because I want to know can any SJ love more than one person. I'm not saying anything about MUST in love with one person.

    To actually answer your question though, and get your panties untwisted - I believe that I am fully capable of being in a polygamist relationship, whether it be multiple women and one man, multiple women and myself, or myself and multiple men.
    Why don't you just say so since the beginning?


    I am actually in a polygamist relationship with two bisexual males, and it is one of the most rewarding experiences of my life. :)
    This explains why you got offended so easily.


    As a side note, you're very rude, and I'm sure you understand my response in kind to such rudeness. Have a nice day.
    Umm...
    Nope, I don't know. I'm actually quite surprise with your reaction. I don't see anything rude in my comments about you, as I don't remember having any negative intention toward you. I think you're overreacting.



    Wake, Seamaid, natashasghost and 1 others thanked this post.

  11. #10
    ISFJ - The Nurturers

    If I had more energy, I'd try to go through each thing that you pointed out, because in a lot of them, you misunderstood my meaning - once again I believe because of a language barrier - and I have a tendency to figure that most people understand English (which is wrong of me) so I don't take the time to flesh out my thoughts completely. I'm sorry that we're having trouble understanding each other. I won't derail your thread any more. :)

    I would like to point out that my "judging" people for thinking polygamy is disgusting isn't precisely what you think. I'm not upset because they don't agree with polygamy - I'm upset because their choice of words is rude and hurtful to people that practice polygamy. I have no problem with people not accepting polygamy, and thinking that monogamy is the way to be. I have a problem with people being righteous about it, and thinking that their individual way is the only way - I think that if you disagree with something you can say it in a much better way than "that's disgusting" - it shows disdain for other peoples' way of life, and I think it's part of the problem with the world today. And as much as people have the right to express their opinion and feel the way that they do - I also have that right. My choice is to try explain things in way so that they might understand different lifestyles.


    natashasghost thanked this post.


     
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. So what does an ISFP feel like when they're in love with a person?
    By Kevinaswell in forum ISFP Forum - The Artists
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 01-15-2016, 09:35 AM
  2. Hi -- New Person Here.
    By Deveron in forum Intro
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 11-28-2009, 12:32 AM
  3. New person!
    By Robatix in forum Intro
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 01:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.
Information provided on the site is meant to complement and not replace any advice or information from a health professional.
© 2014 PersonalityCafe
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0