I would like to start a discussion about Supervision Relations in socionics as this seems to be a common type of relationship encountered among friends and romantic partners.
Has anyone been in these types of relations? What are your and your friend's/partner's socionics types (left or right Supervision ring?) Who sought contact first / who pursued whom first? How does your experience match with their socionics description? Is there anything that you could add to this profile? Anything that you did not find to match your situation?
Types that are in relations of Supervision are as follows, with type preceding being the Supervisor to type that comes after:
Left ring of Supervision:
...> ENTp > ISTj > ESFp > INFj > ENTp > ...
...> ISFp > ENFj > INTp > ESTj > ISFp > ...
Right ring of Supervision:
...> ESFj > ISTp > ENTj > INFp > ESFj > ...
...> INTj > ENFp > ISFj > ESTp > INTj > ...
If you don't know your Socionics type, check the links and tests in this thread: http://personalitycafe.com/socionics-forum/116599-socionics-tests-links-resources.html
Description:
These relations are also asymmetrical as are relations of Benefit. One partner, called the Supervisor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Supervisee.
Relations of Supervision can give the impression that Supervisor is constantly watching every step of the Supervisee. The latter usually feels this control even if the Supervisor does not say or do anything. The explanation for this is that the Supervisee weak point is defenceless against the Supervisor's strong point. This makes the Supervisee nervous and expect the worse.
Although the Supervisor can seem self-satisfied, petty, faultfinding and narrative, the Supervisee pays attention to their actions and considers the Supervisor as consequential. The Supervisee normally wants to gain recognition and commendation from the Supervisor. However, it may seem like the Supervisor always undervalues the abilities of the Supervisee. This stimulates the Supervisee into proving their own worthiness with various actions, yet there is little chance that they will succeed.
The Supervisor sees the Supervisee as quite interesting and capable, but incomplete and therefore in need of some help and advice. The Supervisee does not respond to this aid as expected and this will often increase the Supervisor's attempts to change the Supervisee. Because the Supervisee naturally does not understand what it is that the Supervisor wants from them, this may irritate the Supervisor, who thinks that the Supervisee simply does not want to understand.
In relations of Supervision it may also appear as if the Supervisor patronises the Supervisee, which can be quite obtrusive for the latter. When there are more than two people present, the Supervisee often attempts to release themselves from the control of the Supervisor by starting arguments for the sake of it or by attempting to manoeuvre themselves into the commanding position. Unfortunately, these attempts lead nowhere. The Supervisor may think instead that the Supervisee simply requires more attention.
Supervision partners often look like good friends. The reason for this is that in these relations both partners can sense their social value: the Supervisor as a "guardian angel", without whom the Supervisee will get into trouble, and the Supervisee as the object of attention.
(more info about relations of supervision)
Has anyone been in these types of relations? What are your and your friend's/partner's socionics types (left or right Supervision ring?) Who sought contact first / who pursued whom first? How does your experience match with their socionics description? Is there anything that you could add to this profile? Anything that you did not find to match your situation?
Types that are in relations of Supervision are as follows, with type preceding being the Supervisor to type that comes after:
Left ring of Supervision:
...> ENTp > ISTj > ESFp > INFj > ENTp > ...
...> ISFp > ENFj > INTp > ESTj > ISFp > ...
Right ring of Supervision:
...> ESFj > ISTp > ENTj > INFp > ESFj > ...
...> INTj > ENFp > ISFj > ESTp > INTj > ...
If you don't know your Socionics type, check the links and tests in this thread: http://personalitycafe.com/socionics-forum/116599-socionics-tests-links-resources.html
Description:
These relations are also asymmetrical as are relations of Benefit. One partner, called the Supervisor, is always in a more favourable position in respect to the other partner who is known as Supervisee.
Relations of Supervision can give the impression that Supervisor is constantly watching every step of the Supervisee. The latter usually feels this control even if the Supervisor does not say or do anything. The explanation for this is that the Supervisee weak point is defenceless against the Supervisor's strong point. This makes the Supervisee nervous and expect the worse.
Although the Supervisor can seem self-satisfied, petty, faultfinding and narrative, the Supervisee pays attention to their actions and considers the Supervisor as consequential. The Supervisee normally wants to gain recognition and commendation from the Supervisor. However, it may seem like the Supervisor always undervalues the abilities of the Supervisee. This stimulates the Supervisee into proving their own worthiness with various actions, yet there is little chance that they will succeed.
The Supervisor sees the Supervisee as quite interesting and capable, but incomplete and therefore in need of some help and advice. The Supervisee does not respond to this aid as expected and this will often increase the Supervisor's attempts to change the Supervisee. Because the Supervisee naturally does not understand what it is that the Supervisor wants from them, this may irritate the Supervisor, who thinks that the Supervisee simply does not want to understand.
In relations of Supervision it may also appear as if the Supervisor patronises the Supervisee, which can be quite obtrusive for the latter. When there are more than two people present, the Supervisee often attempts to release themselves from the control of the Supervisor by starting arguments for the sake of it or by attempting to manoeuvre themselves into the commanding position. Unfortunately, these attempts lead nowhere. The Supervisor may think instead that the Supervisee simply requires more attention.
Supervision partners often look like good friends. The reason for this is that in these relations both partners can sense their social value: the Supervisor as a "guardian angel", without whom the Supervisee will get into trouble, and the Supervisee as the object of attention.
(more info about relations of supervision)