I've been reviewing the possibilities of being type 6 because I seem to be different from the typical wings. I'm also more openly aggressive, and more active than most 1s. I think I maybe a SO6 described below by Naranjo:
I have always considered myself to be playing a role in a process, and have loyalty to the cause, but I don't like people. I just help them because I know they carry greatness of their own and intend to better their situation so they may help the causes.
I don't identify much with the group-orientation of the SO6 spoke of my that site, but instead only by Naranjo.
Any advice as to how I would know if I'm not a 1 and a 6?
Illustrated as The Prussian, as other type 6s are warm the SO6 is cold, very precise, love of precision, summons up much courage to say something is white or black because it is easier to say there is ambiguity and gray areas on topics, incredibly concerned with dutiful, a little bit of a mind of a caregiver, intellectually act in a way that must figure out where north and south is, if they're ever to become human they need to become crazy first and forget about duty and not duty then connect with intuition and a lack thereof which is basically questioning everything they know and do.
A 6 of such sorts is something I can identify with very much, I may have misinterpreted my tendencies to this point. This type 6 would be loyal to a large extent to a cause and how it betters thing then carry a rebelliousness and desire to strip ambiguity from the world, which has been my drive on PerC. When I started taking on personality theory I threw everything out and slowly invited everything again to not allow the theories to overlap and create gray areas in interpretation, which really aligns with what Naranjo said about needing to forget everything to live again. 'The Prussian' sounds very much like a 1 sort of characterization, but in terms of a 6.http://www.enneagramworldwide.com/explore-the-enneagram/instinctual-subtypes/instinctual-subtypes-social-instinctual.php said:Type 6: Duty
In the social domain, you assuage your fear through your loyal duty to a group or cause. You feel safe bonded together with others in a common cause where you understand the needs and assure the code of behavior. You align with people you trust through mutual obligations and sacrifice: “United we stand, divided we fall.” You find power and hence safety in the group’s authority. Knowing the rules and creating clear agreements with friends and colleagues are vital for overcoming your fear. As a Loyal Skeptic, your tendency to project negative power onto the world makes underdog causes particularly appealing. You align with the needy, the oppressed and the persecuted. You work for the cause. The call to duty mobilizes you rather not personal gain, which would expose you. But at your worst, you give away your own authority and power.
I have always considered myself to be playing a role in a process, and have loyalty to the cause, but I don't like people. I just help them because I know they carry greatness of their own and intend to better their situation so they may help the causes.
I don't identify much with the group-orientation of the SO6 spoke of my that site, but instead only by Naranjo.
Any advice as to how I would know if I'm not a 1 and a 6?