Personality Cafe banner

1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,301 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
This site seems to think so.
Here's what they say about the relationship:

The Supervision relations are asymmetric with one partner being the Supervisor and the other – Supervisee.
These relations are considered the worst possible in Socionics. The Supervisor's “Leading„ function is the “Vulnerable„ function of the Supervisee. But unlike the Conflicting relations the Supervisee cannot “hit back„ as his “Leading„ function is the strong “Creative„ function of his Supervisor.
To the Supervisor it seems that the Supervisee is a capable but incomplete person, who can benefit from his advice and attention. As his advice goes from his “Leading„ function straight to the “Vulnerable„ function of his Supervisee, but in a way that the Supervisee not only understands, but is identical to how he sees the world, the Supervisee is left willing to learn, but completely unable to do so.
To the Supervisor it starts to look as if the Supervisee deliberately ignores his advice, which leads to the displeasure of the Supervisor, who starts to force his picture of the world (the “Leading„ function of the Supervisor and the “Vulnerable„ function of the Supervisee) – with an intent only to explain his dissatisfaction, but again in the way (through his “Creative„ function) that seems justified to the Supervisee, who feels angry and undervalued, but keeps on trying to satisfy his partner.
If the Supervisee tries to explain his feelings, the Supervisor thinks that the Supervisee makes troubles for nothing.
Depending on the types of people involved and psychological distance, this might take different amount of time before a complete break-up.
Romance:Supervision relations are common for the romance and marriage. Partners share two values out of for with the strong Leading function of the Supervisee being the strong Creative function of the Supervisor. But the Leading function of the Supervisor is the weak Vulnerable function of the Supervisee.
Therefore people often find supervision relations intriguing. They have common points and share area of interests so that spending time together can be rewarding.
For the Supervisee the Supervisor is someone who's able to deal effortlessly with the kind of problems they've always been struggling with, which can build admiration and respect in the beginning.
The Supervisor often sees the Supervisee as someone to whom they can relate, but who lacks some experience in life and needs their help and advice.
Due to the partly shared values, the Supervisee in the beginning tries to follow that advice. Even if it is hard for them, they agree on the advantages and see the advice as valuable. But later on, they find out that no matter how hard they try, they are not able to perform to the standards put in place by the Leading function of the Supervisor. That realization often takes a long time.
They also often project their vision of life on to their Supervisor due to the shared values and it is very hard to see the big differences in the attitudes.
The Supervisor at this point begins to feel underrated, as in his/her eyes he/she does all the heavy lifting and don't get anything in return. They would expect to get the kind of support they would from their Duals, which is impossible as the strongest function of their Duals is the background function of the Supervisee. That means that the Supervisee acts on it subconsciously and mostly to protect their partner from these kind of information completely. Which is counterproductive, as the Supervisor needs and appreciates this type of information.
The Supervisor also starts to perceive the lack of ability of the Supervisee as a deliberate sabotage. As for the Supervisor it is incomprehensible how someone could not be able to deal with such an obvious and natural type of information.
At the same time the Supervisee feels he/she does more than he/she should be expected to and also doesn't get anything in return as their partner lacks two of their values.
Often people in the Supervision relations break up feeling betrayed and blaming the other partner for all the troubles.
The Supervision relations are considered to be the toughest in Socioncs. And also very misleading as in the beginning they can be quite fulfilling.
Being in a relationships with your Supervisor or Supervisee would take a lot of effort in order to make it work and in the end will require to make a lot of conscious compromises based on the knowledge of your partners type almost with every step you take.
- See more at: http://e*********.com/index.php?page=*********&category=relations&relation=Supervision#sthash.kVlHB2d3.dpuf


Thoughts?
I'm thinking there may be some truth to this. I've always felt like I've had more difficult relations with SLE (Supervisor) than SEE (conflict). Then again, I don't know as many SEEs and haven't had as much experience with them. I could be mistyping myself as LII and I'm really EII but this point I doubt it.

The assymetry part of it is interesting. At least in a conflict relationship, you can strike back so you're not as powerless. In a supervision relationship, it doesn't quite work that way, one person always has the 'upper hand.'

Do you think it matters if you're the supervisor or the supervisee? Which is worse?
Personally I find it worse to be on the supervisee end as I feel more helpless and inadequate but the being on the supervisor end definitely brings it's own challenges.

I supervise IEE. I greatly respect their Ne and Fi skills but their PoLR is Ti. Why is it that they can't get the basic Ti stuff? It's like they're not even trying to get it. Oh yeah, their PoLR is where my base it.

So do you find that talking to your supervisee is like banging your head against a brick wall?

Where do you think supervision relations rank amongst all of the other relation types?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,545 Posts
Dunno about that. I'm gonna catch a movie with my Supervisor in a couple of days. They really don't seem all that bad, LSIs...

Well, no, wtf am I saying?I've seen some disgustingly paranoid ones around and they act like I'm a little baby who doesn't understand the first thing about reality. The funny thing is I don't feel as insecure or inadequate as much as I feel angry, around them. The way some of them think... Seriously, it's ridiculous. They are the ultimate conspiracy theorists, their humor is often socially disrespectful and the majority of them have a terrible Ni HA. Put that together with Ti dominance and Te ignoring and superego Fi and poor Fe and just OH. GOD. :angry:

But I usually give them the benefit of the doubt in the beginning because a lot of them are powerfully interesting at the start.
 

·
Heretic
ESI 9w8 5w4 2w1
Joined
·
10,672 Posts
Whenever someone makes a profile about anything it seems that people forget something.
It will still be a mixed bag of candy.
No the profiles are not rules of how the interaction must pan out.
I look upon them more as potential caveats and sticking points to be kept i mind.
Cause if you don't heed the warning signs that is where you will end up.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,309 Posts
It seems that my Conflictor was infact my Supervisor so yes it is far worse. I am not even sure if Conflictor is really a conflictor even a Super-Ego Relationship turned out to be a Kindred.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,102 Posts
Not from my experience on the forums based on what type people claim to be (I'm not confident in my ability to type irl). ESEs just sort of mind their own business and have a jolly good time dicking around, but it seems like beta NFs are on a grand moral crusade with the goal of making me kill myself.

I'm still not certain of being SLI though, as I don't understand my supposed leading function. Some people say Si is memory, some people say Si is about jacking off with style.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,961 Posts
No, actually, I don't agree. Supervisor shares at least 2 valued elements and same cognitive style with the supervisee, which makes them closer in a sense and less irritating than conflict relations.

It's just that there is a need to maintain distance at times, which is difficult to do in very close relations. The supervisor doesn't always "catch-on" to this need, and continues trying to get close to the supervisee with his seemingly good intentioned advice not seeing that it depresses the supervisee. The supervisee is then forced to put up a fight to gain the distance that they so desperately need. Hence the potential in supervision relations for fights and hurt feelings. IF the supervisor gives the supervisee space that they need, then the supervisee doesn't feel "pressed into a corner" and fighting can be avoided. After some time, the supevisee will come back and seek out the supervisor themselves.

(It's actually similar to what happens in benefit relations, where the beneficiary needs to distance sometimes, but in benefit the beneficiary has more influence on benefactor than supervisee on supervisor, which makes it easier for them to gain distance.)

The end goal of supervision relations is to let information pass between the quadra. The supervisee actually receives valuable information from the supervisor, which cannot be said of conflict relations where not much of value crosses the high communication barrier.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,438 Posts
I think it depends on how close you try to be with the person. I was with an IEE (my Supervisee), and it basically followed the progression you noted. At first everything seemed great, we seemed similar enough with shared Ne and different enough to learn from each other. But as time went on, we both ended up feeling unappreciated and at the end of things, betrayed. Those feelings are still there, to some degree.

We got to talking as friends again and the relationship can be okay as long as you keep an appropriate distance, which can often be hard to recognize. It is possible to have a healthy relationship with any type, in my opinion, but it may be restricted to certain degree of relationship. With some types, I think I could only share a pleasant acquaintanceship at best. With a Supervisee, I believe it is possible to be fairly good friends, but you have to avoid relying on them whatsoever or allowing them to rely on you, at least in my experience. Any mutual expectation will lead to miscommunication and bitterness.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,309 Posts
No, actually, I don't agree. Supervisor shares at least 2 valued elements and same cognitive style with the supervisee, which makes them closer in a sense and less irritating than conflict relations.
No Conflict actually arises when the Irrational Elements are the same but the Rational ones are different for Example. If the Irrational Elements are also Different and not only the Rational ones this affects how you perceive and therefore how you view the different Rational Elements which are now positive due to a different Perception.

The Cognitive Styles are based on Questionable Samples I highly doubt that there is some truth to it at all.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,227 Posts
Under the same personal distance, Conflictor is worse than being the Supervisee. Things are grayer than that in the real world, though, because the likelihood of having prolonged interaction plays a role in which of these is "worse." I think Supervision ends up overall more frequently degrading than Conflictor, because their Creative function is appealing enough to draw you into cooperation or close interaction. It is easier to be drawn into the setting of a Supervisory relationship than it is a Conflictor, and in that sense, I think they are "worse."

Supervisor and Supervisee share one function in each others' Ego blocks, which is a double edged sword - on one hand, you can share interesting conversations with your Supervisor, and feel that you share something in common. On the other hand, your commonality is not their priority, and this difference in personal weight is felt.

On somewhat of a tangent, I disagree with theorists that you "learn important information" from your Supervisor. Whatever you learn from your Supervisor will remain attained, stored knowledge rather than a flexible, organized cognitive mechanism, which is exactly what preserves the constant degradation the Supervisee feels. Just like we say that Semiduality is not half Duality but less than that, Supervision is not half Mirror but less than that, and a primary concern of Mirror itself is that communication lacks development in the same sphere(s). I won't go so far as to say that your Conflictor's Creative function/your Role is a positive part of the relationship, but I also don't buy into claims that your Supervisor's Creative/your Base is "developmental," nor is input from their Base function particularly valuable.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
994 Posts
Seriously though, Im not sure. Relations with all introverted irrationals always seem to turn sour (pretty sure I am LIE or EIE), regardless of which one they are. Relations with introverted rationals are the best and relations with extroverts are somewhere in between.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,098 Posts
I think I supervise my younger brother. He's about 2 years younger than me. I'm pretty sure he thinks I think he's stupid. He's not stupid (not even close tbh) but because I constantly 'reframe' or 'revise' what he says in terms of my base function, it seems like I'm constantly 'correcting' him even when he's already technically correct. From my POV, I'm just elaborating on what he's saying, expanding on his comment with a related comment as one does in the course of normal conversation-- but from his POV, I'm pretty sure it looks like I'm degrading him or dismissing what he's saying in favor of reframing in terms of my base function.

It doesn't help that I've been doing this for 25 years. Unknowingly, of course; I only figured this out like a week ago. But it's been more than enough time to generate and reinforce a feeling of inferiority in my brother. I'm pretty sure it's there.

So how do I, as the supervisor, minimize negative impact on my supervisee? FWIW, we aren't in daily contact; we see each other like a couple times a month for a few hours each time. What do? :p

Lol, oops, last post was at 10-09-2014. Slight necro. Sorry :p
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
I have an SEE friend. The advice-giving definitely seems to be from her to me. Which seems like hitting a brick wall. I guess her advice seems so...downer-ish. And she expects me to take it. I don't wanna feel bad about my decisions. I want either practical help or leaving me alone. But we still have a good friendship.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,600 Posts
I think I supervise my younger brother. He's about 2 years younger than me. I'm pretty sure he thinks I think he's stupid. He's not stupid (not even close tbh) but because I constantly 'reframe' or 'revise' what he says in terms of my base function, it seems like I'm constantly 'correcting' him even when he's already technically correct. From my POV, I'm just elaborating on what he's saying, expanding on his comment with a related comment as one does in the course of normal conversation-- but from his POV, I'm pretty sure it looks like I'm degrading him or dismissing what he's saying in favor of reframing in terms of my base function.

It doesn't help that I've been doing this for 25 years. Unknowingly, of course; I only figured this out like a week ago. But it's been more than enough time to generate and reinforce a feeling of inferiority in my brother. I'm pretty sure it's there.

So how do I, as the supervisor, minimize negative impact on my supervisee? FWIW, we aren't in daily contact; we see each other like a couple times a month for a few hours each time. What do? :p

Lol, oops, last post was at 10-09-2014. Slight necro. Sorry :p
That's probably the most correct reference to the ITR that I've heard someone say. It's like a "yes, but have you thought about this." It does work, it just isn't often seen, nor direct. I had an ILE have a significant breakthrough at work last week and succeeded at an Alpha issue that had been plaguing the place for months. It went Ne->Fi->Fe. Happened the same day that I had just a regular, extended conversation with him. Keep in mind, base rubs off simply by talking openly and honestly, without having to try to correct.
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top