That's writing that has no inherent meaning (or rather, it can but then it's-- ah, what the heck, here's the Wikipedia article). I like asemic writing mainly because I do con-script-ing (that is, I make constructed scripts (I don't conscript) which is a subset of Conlang which is uh-- here's another Wikipedia article).
Anyway, what I want you to do is post a picture of your asemic writing.
If you want, it'd be nice if you could make at-least three attempts at asemic writing. with the criteria being that the first attempt has the characters seperate (as if you were writing in print) the second attempt has the "characters" of the writing all flow together (as if cursive) and the third attempt be just large complex characters.
Here's a picture of my asemic writing (in the format specified above):
![]()
The reason I'm doing this is because a while back I noticed some asemic writing that looks just like mine. I'd think that the chances that two asemic writing styles looking similar would be less likely than normal writing styles looking similar because there are fewer restrictions on the form of the writing. Though I suppose that being that we all write in latin script (If you don't... well, then how are you managing to read this right now?) there will be an inclination to write in a similar form to latin script. If you often write in cyrillic, kanji, or any other script I'd be especially interested in seeing your asemic writing.
Whatever you do, please DON'T try emulating someone else's writing. That would defeat the whole purpose (that is to say that it'll defeat the purpose of it not having a purpose (If you really want to do that go make a thread titled Semic writing or something).
Anyway, what I want you to do is post a picture of your asemic writing.
If you want, it'd be nice if you could make at-least three attempts at asemic writing. with the criteria being that the first attempt has the characters seperate (as if you were writing in print) the second attempt has the "characters" of the writing all flow together (as if cursive) and the third attempt be just large complex characters.
Here's a picture of my asemic writing (in the format specified above):
The reason I'm doing this is because a while back I noticed some asemic writing that looks just like mine. I'd think that the chances that two asemic writing styles looking similar would be less likely than normal writing styles looking similar because there are fewer restrictions on the form of the writing. Though I suppose that being that we all write in latin script (If you don't... well, then how are you managing to read this right now?) there will be an inclination to write in a similar form to latin script. If you often write in cyrillic, kanji, or any other script I'd be especially interested in seeing your asemic writing.
Whatever you do, please DON'T try emulating someone else's writing. That would defeat the whole purpose (that is to say that it'll defeat the purpose of it not having a purpose (If you really want to do that go make a thread titled Semic writing or something).
