I was saying that washing was pretty much the only difference, and it's not that much of a difference.Yes, I know I have to wash my junk, that really wasn't the question.
It's quite subjective.So... Which would be better?
what?!A penis typically performs like a penis, so if anything the girl at work should be judged, and not the penis.
Otherwise you'll get as many different opinions on the matter as there are women.
So you're saying the man in question is to decide for the women in question, at least partially, whether or not she's supposed to like whatever the penis in question looks like?what?!
They ought to be a person with a brain connected to the penis. And that person should bear some of the judgement too. . . if not all of it.
Probably both.So you're saying the man in question is to decide for the women in question, at least partially, whether or not she's supposed to like whatever the penis in question looks like?
Otherwise I'm afraid I didn't quite get your inquiry. Or you didn't get mine. Or both.
Naturally not.Probably both.
Well not all penises are alike. Not all perform the same. Not all men like the same thing.
So if the woman doesn't like it, it's not all down to her.
An uncut man has an extra bit of skin that can be moved up and down. And that makes a difference in more than just texture.Naturally not.
My statement was regarded to (un)cut during blowjobs, and what penis version would be preferable. I assume that both penises in question would perform the same way, in which case the enjoyment of the oral received, if anything, boils down to the girl's / women's performance, so if anything had to be judged that should be it.
Otherwise it boils down to texture only, in which case I doubt anyone would be so shallow enough to bother with such petty things. Still, you'd obviously get as many opinions on the subject as there are women, making the whole evaluation quite moot at the end of the day, as you'd have to find "the right" one in either case, may it be cut or uncut.