I was wondering if the whole MBTI thing can cause divisions. What if your type, at some point, has become a self fulfilling prophecy that you adhere to because you assume that you are that way? Like suddenly you become more critical, scattered, rigid or whatsoever than you were before.
To clarify, yes I do appreciate that I identify as INFP, it is life changing that I've found a group of people who remind me of myself even with our differences because I grew up feeling like I was different from the common norm. Yes I do have highly idealizing tendencies, yes I can be very abstract, yes I like to tap into my intuitive side so I can discover more personal unique meanings, etc, etc.
However, I am more than just that, seriously. I sometimes feel that when I came out as INFP, certain other-type posters immediately assume:
Wtf.
So when I do stand up for myself, they seem to get more annoyed, as if ,''oh hey you're an INFP. You're not supposed to do that''. And sometimes when I do not 'stand up for myself', it could actually mean I'm thinking,''Uh..this person sounds close minded..why should I bother arguing? It'd be like arguing with a brick wall.'' Get me?
When it comes to logic..seriously, if I am only about feelings and never about logic, then what the hell am I doing trying to reason this out. I don't think I'd even talk about certain aspects of politics and human nature if I didn't have logic. I think I'd be living in a treehouse by now if I don't have logic. I do have it; just because I can be very involved in my subjective world, it doesn't mean I am far removed from logical reality.
I am more than just an INFP, I have complex layers of strengths and weaknesses, and after observing personality forums a whole lot, I wonder if typing has created some unnecessary divisions although I am grateful for MBTI.
To clarify, yes I do appreciate that I identify as INFP, it is life changing that I've found a group of people who remind me of myself even with our differences because I grew up feeling like I was different from the common norm. Yes I do have highly idealizing tendencies, yes I can be very abstract, yes I like to tap into my intuitive side so I can discover more personal unique meanings, etc, etc.
However, I am more than just that, seriously. I sometimes feel that when I came out as INFP, certain other-type posters immediately assume:
- She'll be too weak to stand up for herself when she needs to be
- She won't apply logic when necessary
Wtf.
So when I do stand up for myself, they seem to get more annoyed, as if ,''oh hey you're an INFP. You're not supposed to do that''. And sometimes when I do not 'stand up for myself', it could actually mean I'm thinking,''Uh..this person sounds close minded..why should I bother arguing? It'd be like arguing with a brick wall.'' Get me?
When it comes to logic..seriously, if I am only about feelings and never about logic, then what the hell am I doing trying to reason this out. I don't think I'd even talk about certain aspects of politics and human nature if I didn't have logic. I think I'd be living in a treehouse by now if I don't have logic. I do have it; just because I can be very involved in my subjective world, it doesn't mean I am far removed from logical reality.
I am more than just an INFP, I have complex layers of strengths and weaknesses, and after observing personality forums a whole lot, I wonder if typing has created some unnecessary divisions although I am grateful for MBTI.