Exactly. No use arguing against something that cannot be proved scientifically and concretely.
Exactly. No use arguing against something that cannot be proved scientifically and concretely.Only an INTP would be so religiously undecided that s/he calls him/herself "agnostic atheist".
Is that like "I believe that there is no god, but I believe that knowledge about the existence of god is impossible, thus rendering every further debate about the existence or non-existence of said god pointless"?
Reminds me of a movie of a name I forget where the camera suddenly zooms out... and out... and out... through the universe and out into a room where there is a boy playing with a marble shaped like a planet. He is flicking it at other marbles at the floor also shaped like planets.I'm not even sure if it was 'created by hand'. Big bang could have been the boot-up process of some massive simulation. If it doesn't work, then fix the parameters (physical laws and such) and reboot. We humans like to play things like The Sims or MMORPGS, who knows if higher intelligences would engage in something similar but far more sophisticated?
of course there's no proof, just interesting to think about..