Yes. My answers to these questions are almost identical to Proteus. In considering the murder/robbery scenario, I noted my thinking going in loops. I visualized the crime scene details, played it out as a murder, noted the details again, played it out as a robbery gone bad. Then I ran out of details to work with, noted that I need more information and thought about how to get it. My default position is in the theory, and the details are there to support and revise it.
ISTP's V. INTP's reasoning skills
I had a question for fellow INTP's and ISTP's out there:
Would you say that ISTP's Ti function works in accordance with an inductive reasoning level:starting from the facts in front of you and gathering up all the information to come up with a general theory?
And vice versa, would you say that INTP's Ti function works in accordance with a deductive reasoning level: Starting from a general theory and working down to the details?
Would this be an accurate assumption?
Would you say that ISTP's Ti function works in accordance with an inductive reasoning level:starting from the facts in front of you and gathering up all the information to come up with a general theory?
And vice versa, would you say that INTP's Ti function works in accordance with a deductive reasoning level: Starting from a general theory and working down to the details?
Would this be an accurate assumption?
1 - 2 of 14 Posts
1 - 2 of 14 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Personality Cafe
A forum community dedicated to all ranges of personality types and people. Come join the discussion about health, behavior, care, testing, personality types, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Top Contributors this Month
View All
WickerDeer
755 Replies
Ms. Aligned
648 Replies
ENTJudgement
646 Replies
