Yes. My answers to these questions are almost identical to Proteus. In considering the murder/robbery scenario, I noted my thinking going in loops. I visualized the crime scene details, played it out as a murder, noted the details again, played it out as a robbery gone bad. Then I ran out of details to work with, noted that I need more information and thought about how to get it. My default position is in the theory, and the details are there to support and revise it.And vice versa, would you say that INTP's Ti function works in accordance with a deductive reasoning level: Starting from a general theory and working down to the details?