[bearotter]

I know I'm an Ne and Fe but I don't know what is dom and how to order my other functions.

Dominant type is hard.

The more you prefer Fe, the more you reject Te. That's the rule of thumb. But you can be somewhat balanced on that front --- many people if they look hard will tend to have a preference.
If you reject Te, your thinking will tend to have a more Ti flavor.

To find your dominant type, I'd advise understandng what rational vs. irrational functions really are. You can perceive something before you rationalize what it is (I see a crying girl battered on the road; I feel it would be horrible to leave her as is .. first part, the seeing itself, not the characterization, is perception, second part is a feeling judgment).

 

[bearotter]

I'd say though, do not assume / go down the path of thinking you're in a loop. There are a whole host of reasons than being in a loop that phenomena similar to what are described in said article of simulatedworld may occur.

If you really find you have an equal preference for the rational and irrational axes, then sure, consider loops, but I don't think they're even half close to the only reason for that phenomenon (and certainly I doubt should be considered as an explanation for cognitive preferences otherwise).

 

[bearotter]

Yeah it's hard process.

I feel that I'm intuitive because I read people, and am usually correct.

Good sensing can do that better than intuition can unless the intuition is just as strong really. Remember S and N complement each other cognitively. Assuming someone is more comfortable having a detailed map of the details underlying a judgment, they might be more of an SF or ST type. It really depends how you arrive at what you do.

Just give yourself (a lot of) time, and remember to do self-reflection rather than getting addicted to reading material (different people have different views on this, I personally always advocate the self-reflection as paramount).