Personality Cafe banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,652 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
INTJ: Ni, Te, Fi, Se... (Myers-Briggs)
ILI: Ni, Te, Si, Fe, Se, Fi, Ne, Ti (Socionics Model A)

Both of these models are incomplete. Socionics research has proved this:

T blocked with N --> -T and +N
T blocked with S --> +T and -S
F blocked with N --> +F and -N
F blocked with S --> -F and +S

Signs of functions | School of System Socionics

So INTJ would have -Fi in the Myers-Briggs model. However, we know that INTJ has an obvious +Fi.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,491 Posts
INTJ: Ni, Te, Fi, Se... (Myers-Briggs)
ILI: Ni, Te, Si, Fe, Se, Fi, Ne, Ti (Socionics Model A)
...
So INTJ would have -Fi in the Myers-Briggs model. However, we know that INTJ has an obvious +Fi.
Although, like Myers, the official MBTI websites (and other publications) continue to give a limited amount of lip service to the cognitive functions, they've never endorsed the Harold Grant function stack and its associated "tandems" — where INFPs are supposedly Fi-Ne-Si-Te, and you're either an "Ni/Se type" or an "Si/Ne" type (for example). And setting aside that function stack (which has no respectable support behind it), the bigger issue is that official MBTI sources also continue to be heavily dichotomy-centric, and to reflect the fact that virtually all the respectable psychometric support for the MBTI is support for the dichotomies and not the functions.

So contrary to your OP, "INTJ: Ni, Te, Fi, Se" is not really "Myers-Briggs."

If you're interested in reading more about the bogosity of the Harold Grant function stack, you can find quite a lot of discussion in these three posts:

Harold Grant & the tandems
What it means to have validity
The tandems vs. the real MBTI

In any case, though... since you're posting in the MBTI forum, and many of your potential readers are probably unfamiliar with what the plus and minus signs in your "+Fi" and "-Fi" references mean, I think it would be helpful if you'd elaborate on what you mean when you say, "we know that INTJ has an obvious +Fi."

What aspects of a typical INTJ's personality would you say correspond to "+Fi" — and when you say "we know" this, who's "we" and how is it that you think we've come to "know" this?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,652 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Although, like Myers, the official MBTI websites (and other publications) continue to give a limited amount of lip service to the cognitive functions, they've never endorsed the Harold Grant function stack and its associated "tandems" — where INFPs are supposedly Fi-Ne-Si-Te, and you're either an "Ni/Se type" or an "Si/Ne" type (for example). And setting aside that function stack (which has no respectable support behind it), the bigger issue is that official MBTI sources also continue to be heavily dichotomy-centric, and to reflect the fact that virtually all the respectable psychometric support for the MBTI is support for the dichotomies and not the functions.
So contrary to your OP, "INTJ: Ni, Te, Fi, Se" is not really "Myers-Briggs."
If you're interested in reading more about the bogosity of the Harold Grant function stack, you can find quite a lot of discussion in these three posts:
Harold Grant & the tandems
What it means to have validity
The tandems vs. the real MBTI
We have already discussed this... here are my arguments:

http://personalitycafe.com/myers-briggs-forum/589498-myers-briggs-model-incorrect-scientific-evidence.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers–...Type_Indicator

However, many MBTI practitioners hold that the tertiary function is oriented in the same direction same as the dominant function. Using the INTP type as an example, the orientation would be as follows:

Dominant introverted thinking
Auxiliary extraverted intuition
Tertiary introverted sensing
Inferior extraverted feeling

http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/understanding-mbti-type-dynamics/the-fourth-or-inferior-function.htm

"For example, if Thinking were your dominant function, Feeling would be your least-preferred function."

This is the official MBTI website, right?

In any case, though... since you're posting in the MBTI forum, and many of your potential readers are probably unfamiliar with what the plus and minus signs in your "+Fi" and "-Fi" references mean, I think it would be helpful if you'd elaborate on what you mean when you say, "we know that INTJ has an obvious +Fi."
What aspects of a typical INTJ's personality would you say correspond to "+Fi" — and when you say "we know" this, who's "we" and how is it that you think we've come to "know" this?
Signs of Functions (+/-) article from School of System Socionics

"5. Signs in the vital and mental blocks

In practice, identification of sign of vital functions by method of interview does not differ from establishing the signs of mental functions. However, it may be complicated by the fact that in general information pertaining to vital functions is always recalled from memory. The answers may sound vague, approximate, difficult to verbalize. But, at the same, a person is able to adequately assess himself or herself on multidimensional functions of Id block. Therefore, in determining the signs of vital functions, it is better to rely on information coming from person's multidimensional functions.

Observations of the people in the process of typing, as well as analysis of responses to different aspects in terms of signs show that functions of same E/I orientation carry the same sign throughout the TIM model."

ILI/INTJ: +Ni, -Te, +Si, -Fe, -Se, +Fi, -Ne, +Ti

These are the functions that we notice in INTJs. ENFP has an obvious +Fi and ESFP has an obvious -Fi.

Functions in blocks: two poles of the information element vocabulary | School of System Socionics

Sensing of forms (-Si): harmony, aesthetics, beauty
Sensing of perceptions (+Si): cosiness, comfort, pleasant sensations
Material space (-Se): strength, power, control
Psychological (virtual) space (+Se): profit, benefit, gain
Intuition of Time (-Ni): destiny, prevision, fatefulness
Dynamics of actions (+Ni): topicality, timeliness, tendencies
Ethical intuition (-Ne): potential, personality traits, understanding, insight
Object intuition (+Ne): alternatives, possibilities, interpretation, guess, obviousness
Logic of learning (-Ti): system, regularity
Logic of management (+Ti): right, rule
Logic of processes (-Te): processes, technologies
Logic of objects (+Te): things, objects
Territorial ethics (-Fi): influence, rapprochement, repulsion
Ethics of understanding (+Fi): sympathy, affection, benevolent relation
Emotions of sensations (-Fe): emotional force, energy boiling, emotions passed over through tactile, taste or other sensor vocabulary (sour expression, sugary voice, he makes me sick...)
Emotions of events (+Fe): play of feelings, absence of sensory component in vocabulary
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,078 Posts
INTJ: Ni, Te, Fi, Se... (Myers-Briggs)
ILI: Ni, Te, Si, Fe, Se, Fi, Ne, Ti (Socionics Model A)

Both of these models are incomplete. Socionics research has proved this:

T blocked with N --> -T and +N
T blocked with S --> +T and -S
F blocked with N --> +F and -N
F blocked with S --> -F and +S

Signs of functions | School of System Socionics

So INTJ would have -Fi in the Myers-Briggs model. However, we know that INTJ has an obvious +Fi.
But you can't go like that! If you want to be organic, you have to go like this:

Sure, the base and the inf functions are paired with one thing only and your line of thinking can be applied there and it's quite organic when you better think. 1st and last functions get "polluted" by 2nd and 3rd functions respectively and this is what causes such interesting phenomena to exist. But what about the 2nd and 3rd functions? They are in a tight wedge between two functions and it's only natural that they're going to be "polluted" from both sides, no? And because(let's take ESI as an example) -Fi - +Se - -Ti - +Ne "+Se" gets "polluted" by both Fi and Ti(its neighbours), can we really say it has a sign of function? And if so, it is going to be much more influenced than "Fi" or "Ne" are going to be. At least my thoughts.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,374 Posts
What is there in this "Socionics research" that suggests it has any applicability to the functions as detailed in the "Myers-Briggs" theory? As has been mentioned, it's not even true to claim that the XYXY stack is the "Myers-Briggs model" - irrespective of what particular practitioners hold - so it's not even necessarily true that INTJs have "Fi" in the model, let alone with a "sign" before it. Why presume that this "sign" concept can be mapped onto the MBTI theory at all, let alone so directly and specifically as in this OP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Simpson17866

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,491 Posts
Observations of the people in the process of typing, as well as analysis of responses to different aspects in terms of signs show that functions of same E/I orientation carry the same sign throughout the TIM model."

ILI/INTJ: +Ni, -Te, +Si, -Fe, -Se, +Fi, -Ne, +Ti

These are the functions that we notice in INTJs. ENFP has an obvious +Fi and ESFP has an obvious -Fi.
...
Territorial ethics (-Fi): influence, rapprochement, repulsion
Ethics of understanding (+Fi): sympathy, affection, benevolent relation
Which are the eight MBTI types who are considered +Fi types under Model A?

If you disagree with any part of that list (your OP said Model A was also "incomplete"), which are the eight MBTI types who you think are +Fi types?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,418 Posts
The MBTI and Socionics don't even agree on what Sensing and Intuition are (and neither are identical to Jung), much less how particular traits align with the system.

The particular adjectives for "Fi+" in the MBTI are just traits associated with Feeling generally. In fact, "sympathy" in particular tends to be a strong mark of FJ>FP (FPs tend toward "empathy"). This owes itself in part to Grant's scheme (Fe=communal experience, sharing emotion vs Fi=how it relates to me, "I feel your pain") but also connects to measuring actions according to one's own standards (MBTI P) vs objective standards (MBTI J).
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top