Joined
·
487 Posts
So, I've been thinking.
There's that whole tradition where the female is the submissive feller partener, and the male is the dominant, thinker partener. I think this is frankly ridiculous. I would think that though it's a balanced relationshiped, it would be a difficult one to sustain because of the clashes between the two preferences.
I find myself more attracted to feminine men. Slender, agile and softer features versus overly muscular and sharp features, but I would still prefer a thinker.
Your thoughts?
There's that whole tradition where the female is the submissive feller partener, and the male is the dominant, thinker partener. I think this is frankly ridiculous. I would think that though it's a balanced relationshiped, it would be a difficult one to sustain because of the clashes between the two preferences.
I find myself more attracted to feminine men. Slender, agile and softer features versus overly muscular and sharp features, but I would still prefer a thinker.
Your thoughts?