There may have been a "Ways to annoy an ENFP" but its long gone by now, lost in the pile that is our forum.
Plus I don't see why it has to be so specific
What are some good ways of annoying highly-intuitive people? - Quora
Dismiss any suggestion that can't be proven with data. Especially design decisions, like the number of pixels to use in a button border: http://news.cnet.com/google-desi...
Be closed to new ideas and hostile to mistakes.
Require a debate for every decision. Make all decisions based on who can defend their position the best in aggressive verbal debate. When someone comes up with an intuitive idea, start debating with them about it instead of using it as a springboard for further ideas or action.
Insist of making decisions by writing out simple lists of pros and cons, ignoring the fact that this focuses the decision on factors that are easiest to describe verbally, not necessarily the factors that are most important.
Set up meetings where being the loudest, most talkative person counts for more than thoughtfulness, intelligence or insight.
Do not allow for solitary deliberation or thinking. Assume that all quick decision-making is good decision-making.
Require credentials in an area before taking anyone's suggestion about that area seriously. Make distinctions between people based on small differences in past achievement, such as minute differences in GPA. Discount the value of past experience.
Assume that all intelligence falls into two categories: verbal skills and mathematical skills, as measured by standardized tests, debating and especially logic puzzles. Discount, dismiss and ignore all other abilities and talents.
I would like to add
Make Intuitive back track to support argument
Stress the importance of getting every last detail right
Tell them to do something that has already been done and has no opportunity for improvement
Am I missing anything?
Plus I don't see why it has to be so specific
What are some good ways of annoying highly-intuitive people? - Quora
Dismiss any suggestion that can't be proven with data. Especially design decisions, like the number of pixels to use in a button border: http://news.cnet.com/google-desi...
Be closed to new ideas and hostile to mistakes.
Require a debate for every decision. Make all decisions based on who can defend their position the best in aggressive verbal debate. When someone comes up with an intuitive idea, start debating with them about it instead of using it as a springboard for further ideas or action.
Insist of making decisions by writing out simple lists of pros and cons, ignoring the fact that this focuses the decision on factors that are easiest to describe verbally, not necessarily the factors that are most important.
Set up meetings where being the loudest, most talkative person counts for more than thoughtfulness, intelligence or insight.
Do not allow for solitary deliberation or thinking. Assume that all quick decision-making is good decision-making.
Require credentials in an area before taking anyone's suggestion about that area seriously. Make distinctions between people based on small differences in past achievement, such as minute differences in GPA. Discount the value of past experience.
Assume that all intelligence falls into two categories: verbal skills and mathematical skills, as measured by standardized tests, debating and especially logic puzzles. Discount, dismiss and ignore all other abilities and talents.
I would like to add
Make Intuitive back track to support argument
Stress the importance of getting every last detail right
Tell them to do something that has already been done and has no opportunity for improvement
Am I missing anything?