[NekoNinja]

I had a neat idea of making a forum on what you think about the other personality types.

Maybe you like some type because of a trait that they have.
Or maybe you dislike one because of something.

Which one confuses you the most?
Which one would you prefer to be with, in a relationship?
Which is the least/most interesting?
Which do you know the least/most about?
(Feel free to bring up any unasked questions)

Sooo ENTJs, what do you think about the other personality types?

 

[Jinxies]

What other types. Isn't our type the only type? Why should I think about any potential other types... unless of course they get in my way.

MUhahahahhaha:shocked:

 

[Alysaria]

>.> -watches a tumbleweed roll by-

I may not be an ENTJ, but I have observed 1 trend when it comes to type interaction.....if the ENTJ male believes he is an INTJ, then he seems inclined to go on a crusade to make the INTJ guys more aggressive and masculine. Apparently INTJs aren't tough as nails man enough for ENTJs.

 

[Immortal Beloved]

I don't know enough about every single type of personality to really give a thorough answer... But I could answer some of these questions. At this point, I find the ENFP to be the most interesting to me. They inspire me, except me, and stand up to me when needed. I would even go as far to say they are my favorite personality out of them all. But this may be because I don't know enough about all of the personality types. Another personality that I love is the INTP. I find that though all my "demanding, judgmental, bitchiness" that the INTP's (at least the ones I've known) will always forgive these things about me and except me the way I am.

I don't know much about any of "the overseer" types at all. I'm not sure I've ever knowingly encountered one that I can think of... so I'm interested in learning more about them!

 

[Slkmcphee]

They are all useful, in their own ways. :wink:

 

[RomanticRealist]

They are all useful, in their own ways. :wink:

Well of course.

I love seeing how different people are motivated differently, although I can't relate to some of those motivations, it is nevertheless useful to know.

 

[Alysaria]

INTJs are your more subtle cousins. They prefer working in the background to charging into the fray....and instead of steamrolling to get the job done, they quietly put forth the best work possible and turn into a brick wall when anything threatens their efficiency.

 

[bLAze]

Which one confuses you the most?
INxx. sensors are easy. extroverts are easy.

Which one would you prefer to be with, in a relationship?
no preference. what do i think would work best? a smart isfj with a willingness to explore her N.

Which is the least/most interesting?
least intersting - istj's. and they are stubborn as fuck too. they usually dislike me (probably because they know I think they're boring) or at best we share a mutual indifference. i think that from an MBTI standpoint, they are jelous of our extraverted thinking. our version of it is witty, strategical, and succesful. their Si version of Te is substance-less.

most interesting - INxx because, as mentioned they are the hardest for me to read and upon understanding I feel most rewarded.

Which do you know the least/most about?

least - already asked/answered
most - ESxx. extravorts sell themselves and are easy to gauge; sensors are much more simpleminded than intuitors are and have limited complexity.

 

[NiDBiLD]

Percievers confuse me the most. I can not not decide, and usually I feel that the choice has already been made as soon as the information has been presented. Also ESTJ. So close, but so far away.

I am in a relationship with an INFX, and it is the best relation I have had.

The least interesting ones would be SJs in general, and SFJs in particular. We have no common ground. Most interesting - NTs and NFs. Usually the same areas of interest, but different perspectives and knowledge bases.

 

[Slkmcphee]

Percievers confuse me the most. I can not not decide, and usually I feel that the choice has already been made as soon as the information has been presented. Also ESTJ. So close, but so far away.

I am in a relationship with an INFX, and it is the best relation I have had.

The least interesting ones would be SJs in general, and SFJs in particular. We have no common ground. Most interesting - NTs and NFs. Usually the same areas of interest, but different perspectives and knowledge bases.

I couldn't have put it better, although I have married a perceiver, they confuse me a lot in general. Working around the P/J split has taken a lot of effort, but the person is worth it.

I find I like ESTJs for many reasons, but I think that sometimes it is easy for two such strong personalities to butt heads and rub each other the wrong way. I keep these people as casual acquaintances, we joke and play sports well.

My sister is ESFJ and my MIL is ISFJ. Love them but I like to limit my time with them, too. Too controlling, too prone to try to buy you a ticket for a guilt trip.

I admire a lot of things about SJs, mostly the practical application of their J-ness. I would love to have an army of SJs at my command in business or in the field. But I wouldn't hang with too many of them. My ESFJ sister scrap-books and my ISFJ MIL sews teddy bears and my ISTJ grandmother sews quilts. I'm not really "crafty."

I like artisans a lot. I enjoy their utilitarian nature, their competence in their area of expertise, their "get it done" attitude. Artisans are fun and most don't get their feelings hurt when I say insensitive things. They don't "should" all over you (My ESTP father's phrase).

I haven't had a lot of very personal experience with idealists, oddly. I have enjoyed my idealist students when I was teaching, but I have only befriended an ENFP as an adult, and that friendship went down in flames.

 

[Abstract Essence]

They are all great, well-meaning people who live in a different reality