Sorry if my reading skills are off..heh.. Do you mean, we try to adapt their language and encourage them to adapt ours for a while? You mean in the sense that we try to learn their language without giving up our own emotional language?
Considering how weird it came out, I'm happy it wasn't complete gibberish.
And yes, I meant that we could try to 'mimic' their way of communicating, while they try to 'mimic' us.
While still keeping ourself, see it as talking a different language, looking at things from a new perspective (or how you wish to put it)
When it comes to languages, as long as you get the message across, it doesn't really matter how horrible your accent is.
Although my Feeler side is almost always dominant, I do have a Thinker side in me. I practise it when I study, talk and think about politics.
Which is great =)
And now on to the real answer:
It was mainly aimed at Sarek, but I'll try to explain.
What I meant was that I'm pretty confident we can be fully understood by others, and vice versa.
All it takes is a different medium, if the person we are trying to explain to, wants to understand as much as we want to explain, I think that erases a lot of the borders we have in our ways of thinking.
(Regarding two Nf's, there isn't a real border as far as I'm concerned, just different perspectives, and those we can bridge with ease, generally. This is mainly aimed at explaining Fi-Ne to Te-Si)
Now imagine if we also switch to another way of explaining using Te/Ti f.ex. The actual things that could be 'adapted' are up for discussion, I'm just trying to give examples.
If we rationalize our beliefs, feelings and values (translating), while the other person is connecting to their compass, trying to figure out how and why THEY feel about things, what they value, and believe. That should pave way for some interesting results.
(Or I'm just crazy) Sidenote: It might be better if just one side is 'translating', could look funny if the cross-communication backfires, leading to complete madness. (Such as trying to use logical forms while the person in front of you is pouring his/her heart out regarding feelings)
We should be able to make sense to others, translating what we feel, what we value, who we are (From our point of view), into something that makes sense to T's, ergo bridging said gap. And, if the person who try to understand us, also has some insight regarding Ne/Ni, Fe/Fi. We could even cross-communicate using our weaker sides.
Would be pretty interesting seeing a Infp-Estj interaction if both were using their shadowfunctions
If this and my earlier post comes off as rubbish, please do tell, even if you think it's completely retarded

. It was a sidetrack that jumped up when I was answering to Sarek.