Personality Cafe banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Please refer to these for additional information:

  • Many world interpretation
  • Holographic universe or anything similar to these

Those information on that links (for the whole parts or some of it) may or may not be the same compared to my descriptions here. Probably you will notice where the different is or where the sameness is. Please notify me for the differentiation or the sameness one to another.

UNIVERSE

There is only one universe as myself, but there could be multiple universes inside myself. These universes are possibilities, but there is only huge universe as myself.

Compared to others, there are more universes as many as themselves. I am using parable in this case. It’s not a complete substitution but at least closer to understand for what i meant.

Imagine these:

There is water, and from water we can see an ice ball. Single ice ball would be considered as a border of universe for myself. Inside an ice ball there is a little bit liquidity and it called my consciousness. Multiply it for any of us. So if there are billion people, then there are billion of a kind of ice balls.

What we perceive as living, it’s differentiation from one state to another state of liquidity in the middle of my own ice ball (this ice causes a sense of territory – I am not you).

Universe is not the ice ball, but it’s one of possible differentiation of a state of liquidity in the middle of my ice ball.

If there is another observer (it’s me or you) directs his perceptions at the coordinates of the location, then at the speed of light or almost instantaneously or simultaneously, there would be” copy and paste ‘of such material (“x”) reflected to the universe of the observer, so that the observer will see the material (“x”) with slightly different based on different points of view.

When you are touching your friend, then there is a changing of liquidity (consciousness) in the middle of your ice ball and giving you perception that there is you and your friend and you are trying to touch your friend. On another ice ball owned by (as) your friend, there will be synchronized to your action, so if you succeed touched your friend, then inside your friend’s ice ball, there will be a changing of liquidity (consciousness) that reflects your friend is being touched by you.

In Other Words:

When we didn’t interact with someone, then there is no changing (relevantly) on the state of consciousness from someone else (that has a chance to be interacted with us), but once we did interact with someone then probably there was a chance for the changing on the state of consciousness from someone else as a reflection of the interaction in between us and someone else.

Or, if in between us we were not watching each other, then there would be no significant changing on our consciousness that reflect our interaction (but our potentiality of our presences were exist but not yet to be manifested, not yet to be perceived by ourselves), and when i was watching you, then suddenly i could see you (you were materialized on my perception) and almost instantly on your consciousness there was changing of the state of your consciousness where myself was materialized on your perception.

There is no causality (that can be observed empirically) inside your universe (yourself). Causality (that can be observed empirically) is between my universe and yours to control how something should be related.

We Are All Connected Each Other

It has meaning that in one (single) universe there is only me (one consciousness) and no one else (no other consciousness). Every creature (that has consciousness) has its own single universe. For just one (single) universe, there is only one consciousness, but there maybe many events or similar in one universe.

So, (if there are outsider) observing multiple universes, then the outsider will only see all changing consciousness as one (single) scenario. of life. Its like giant puzzle.

There will be no duplication for each of us. That is why i disbelieve with MWI (many world interpretation). Also i disbelieve parallel universes as mentioned generally.

Parallel Universes

If someday we found ourselves in another parallel universe (in the sense that we can observe another universe of your friend or else), then only we are as living being with consciousness, another you (other than yourself while reading this) never equipped with consciousness.

Many world in my version assert the fact that for each of universe donates one (single) actor (consciousness). For each of the existing universe, contributing only one (single) consciousness (me or you, or him, or her, or other living being) joined with others to form a big event (scenario, movement, causality etc) with no duplication.

Its like we are playing online game, each of us has its own display with our own avatar. But on the other side (your friend while interact with you) has its own appearance on its own display. My display and another display owned by my friend (while doing interaction with me) has different appearance, but both displays are SYNCHRONIZING each other (which may be known as CAUSALITY, that can be observed empirically). And for each of display connected only to one (single) consciousness (in this analogy similar to myself as a player).

Synchronizing Each Other

Why there is no single causality (that can be observed empirically) inside your universe ? Because we can not observe ourselves, since observer and what is being observed is in unity, but the interaction between us indicates there is observer (the player) and something that being observed (as a result of the synchronization) between one universe to another universe (in interaction between you and me).

Causality

Causality in this understanding is the kind of a sequence from whole scenario to the next of the whole scenario. It’s like we are watching films, frame by frame, where the causality can’t be found within a frame (whole scenario, details) but we can find it outside the frames, where these (causalities) control what frame should be involved for the next session.

Empty Space In Universe

Empty space within universe is not nothingness. If there is a process that could lead to something toward the zero condition, where all particles motion stop COMPLETELY, then it turned into something we recognize as empty space.

If we are able to raise just a little movement using (Just) empty space, then a specific area as an empty space will be visible, manifest as a certain material (and take a form relevantly to the circumstances of the movement).

In terms of awareness, along with the collapse of something toward the zero condition, where all particle motion stops completely, then it turned into something we recognize as empty space.

If we are able to control our consciousness and is able to strengthen the will, somehow we can transform the space into a particular matter.

In other words, empty space is solid. Empty space is not nothingness, otherwise there is nothingness within not nothingness, which is impossible, since nothingness can’t separate reality.

The Smallest

The more we go into the particles, then the final frontier of particle is not the smallest particle (or the smallest of something), but closest to the smallest one is something as functions or further if we can go deeper and deeper, the smallest one is emptiness (space).

CONCLUSION

What is universe? It’s the state of our consciousness

Just by observing, there will be (at speed, almost) instantly a changing of the state of our consciousness. It asserts that in between us and objects that we observed are very closely one to another that can be considered as (closer to) unite (on spiritual term, it will be summed up as unite, that objects are within ourselves)

Well, it’s rather provoking, but perhaps it’s good enough as a modelling to understand reality, or maybe not at all
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,000 Posts
I have said something somewhat similar. lol. Everything is water. We harden into form. Like ice. We crystallize. Or perception does, like a raindrop. Spacetime is water too. The bodies are just like basketballs or soccer balls in it. They are bodies. Like people. They are all connected, and influence each other. They can do it without even touching. They touch through water. The Earth and the moon are fighting right now. The Sun is totally controlling us. We need all this though. These bodies. We somehow all dance in the water.

Freeman Dyson said that atoms are like small pieces of mind. He is interesting:


  • My personal theology is described in the Gifford lectures that I gave at Aberdeen in Scotland in 1985, published under the title, Infinite In All Directions. Here is a brief summary of my thinking. The universe shows evidence of the operations of mind on three levels. The first level is elementary physical processes, as we see them when we study atoms in the laboratory. The second level is our direct human experience of our own consciousness. The third level is the universe as a whole. Atoms in the laboratory are weird stuff, behaving like active agents rather than inert substances. They make unpredictable choices between alternative possibilities according to the laws of quantum mechanics. It appears that mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent inherent in every atom. The universe as a whole is also weird, with laws of nature that make it hospitable to the growth of mind. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension. God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. We stand, in a manner of speaking, midway between the unpredictability of atoms and the unpredictability of God. Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God's mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. I don't say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.

  • The universe is infinite in all directions, not only above us in the large but also below us in the small. If we start from our human scale of existence and explore the content of the universe further and further, we finally arrive, both in the large and the small, at misty distances where first our senses and then even our concepts fail us.


Bruce Lee was all about water too. The Matrix. There is no spoon. Lee said the same thing. lol. There is no opponent.

Question: What are your thoughts when facing an opponent?
Bruce: There is no opponent.
Question: Why is that?
Bruce: Because the word ''l'' does not exist.
A good fight should be like a small play...but played seriously. When the opponent expands, l contract. When he contracts, l expand. And when there is an opportunity... "l" do not hit..."it" hits all by itself (shows his fist).

When one has reached maturity in the art, one will have a formless form. It is like ice dissolving in water. When one has no form, one can be all forms; when one has no style, he can fit in with any style.

“You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can flow, or it can crash. Become like water my friend.”

Water can know anything, by being true to it. Come out undamaged. And leave nothing in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seremonia

·
Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I have said something somewhat similar. lol. Everything is water. We harden into form. Like ice. We crystallize. Or perception does, like a raindrop. Spacetime is water too. The bodies are just like basketballs or soccer balls in it. They are bodies. Like people. They are all connected, and influence each other. They can do it without even touching. They touch through water. The Earth and the moon are fighting right now. The Sun is totally controlling us. We need all this though. These bodies. We somehow all dance in the water.

Freeman Dyson said that atoms are like small pieces of mind. He is interesting:


  • My personal theology is described in the Gifford lectures that I gave at Aberdeen in Scotland in 1985, published under the title, Infinite In All Directions. Here is a brief summary of my thinking. The universe shows evidence of the operations of mind on three levels. The first level is elementary physical processes, as we see them when we study atoms in the laboratory. The second level is our direct human experience of our own consciousness. The third level is the universe as a whole. Atoms in the laboratory are weird stuff, behaving like active agents rather than inert substances. They make unpredictable choices between alternative possibilities according to the laws of quantum mechanics. It appears that mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent inherent in every atom. The universe as a whole is also weird, with laws of nature that make it hospitable to the growth of mind. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension. God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. We stand, in a manner of speaking, midway between the unpredictability of atoms and the unpredictability of God. Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God's mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. I don't say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.

  • The universe is infinite in all directions, not only above us in the large but also below us in the small. If we start from our human scale of existence and explore the content of the universe further and further, we finally arrive, both in the large and the small, at misty distances where first our senses and then even our concepts fail us.


Bruce Lee was all about water too. The Matrix. There is no spoon. Lee said the same thing. lol. There is no opponent.

Question: What are your thoughts when facing an opponent?
Bruce: There is no opponent.
Question: Why is that?
Bruce: Because the word ''l'' does not exist.
A good fight should be like a small play...but played seriously. When the opponent expands, l contract. When he contracts, l expand. And when there is an opportunity... "l" do not hit..."it" hits all by itself (shows his fist).

When one has reached maturity in the art, one will have a formless form. It is like ice dissolving in water. When one has no form, one can be all forms; when one has no style, he can fit in with any style.

“You must be shapeless, formless, like water. When you pour water in a cup, it becomes the cup. When you pour water in a bottle, it becomes the bottle. When you pour water in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Water can flow, or it can crash. Become like water my friend.”

Water can know anything, by being true to it. Come out undamaged. And leave nothing in it.
Nice thought :)
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top