Personality Cafe banner

1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,636 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
So there are many stereotypes floating about when it comes to "feelers" - that they are (overly) sensitive, emotional and even downright illogical. Yet more "official" descriptions I have seen say that having a feeling preference is actually about focusing on values, for example

"The Feeling function looks at the values and relative merit of the issues. In order to make this kind of comparative analysis Feeling relies on having an understanding of the values of all involved. Whereas Thinking is more objective, Feeling is more subjective. The MBTI Manual (Myers, McCauley, Quenk and Hammer) quotes Jung “Feeling, like Thinking, is a rational function, since values in general are assigned according to the laws of reason.”

All this makes me a bit confused about what it really means to have a preference for feeling. Is it as simple as listening to the heart more than the head, and is there really a connection between having a preference for feeling and being more emotional? What does your feeling (or thinking) preference mean to you? :happy:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
55 Posts
I don't think it has to do with how emotional you are. There are Thinkers who have a lot of emotions, and there are probably Feelers who are not very emotional. I always thought it just referred to how you apply your emotions- feelers will make subjective decisions based on their values and feelings. Thinkers are objective and can look past their feelings to make the most logical decisions. I'm pretty sure that's the main difference, at least.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,307 Posts
I always test as an INFP and the description is fairly correct. However, I'm extremely logical and apathetic. I have strong values and a code of morality though, which apparently overrules my lack of feeling and logical nature. I only get feelings when I'm in a relationship. I do think subjectively but it's very logical/rational.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Hypothetical: you're a boss for a smallish business and you have to address some behavior concerns on the staff that are affecting the optimal running of the business. Knowing that implementing any kind of ground rules to curtail behavior (tightening lax requirements, cracking down on tardiness, lessening the budget for non-essential "fun" staff spending, etc.) will make the staff unhappy, but may be better for the business as a functioning entity in the long run, how do you approach the situation? What factors do you consider primarily in making your decision?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,362 Posts
So there are many stereotypes floating about when it comes to "feelers" - that they are (overly) sensitive, emotional and even downright illogical. Yet more "official" descriptions I have seen say that having a feeling preference is actually about focusing on values
Yes, feeling in the MBTI is about values, not emotion.

Feeling is a judging function based on values. Extroverted feeling is about external and/or collective values, introverted feeling is an individual's own value matrix. For me, Fe-aux assigns default legitimacy to external value systems, and then that clashes with Ni (and/or Ni-Se) perception and Ti comes in to take it apart the Fe material for analysis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,610 Posts
Yes, feeling in the MBTI is about values, not emotion.

Feeling is a judging function based on values. Extroverted feeling is about external and/or collective values, introverted feeling is an individual's own value matrix. For me, Fe-aux assigns default legitimacy to external value systems, and then that clashes with Ni (and/or Ni-Se) perception and Ti comes in to take it apart the Fe material for analysis.
And when we are called by someone to value emotion or the emotions of others...

Haha.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,869 Posts
Thinkers generally exclude their value systems in favor of examining "objective evidence" or "potential evidence" (Te and Ti respectively) to make decisions. Their value systems are usually directly impacted the same way, however: utilizing objective or potential evidence (obtained through experiences, research, and thought) helps to guide the Te or Ti user in identifying how and why their core values are important to them.

Feelers generally favor their value systems over subjective or potential evidence, not because they ignore it, but because their value systems are already in place; the process of gleaning evidence has already occurred. Thus when decisions are made, the Fe or Fi user will make decisions objectively (how will this affect environmental values given the value system I have and understand) or subjectively (how will this affect my values given the value system I have and understand).

While the thinkers tend to be more objective than the feelers, this has nothing at all to do with intelligence. (Nor are intuitives more intelligent than sensors.) The misconceptions often come with the NF and NT dichotomies, where both think "outside the box," but the NFs tend to see things "outside the box of physics, inside the box of human values." The NTs tend to ignore both the physics box and the human values box.
 

·
Over 300 Confirmed Kills
Joined
·
10,577 Posts
l think a feeling function can be perfectly rational, but there is a still a distinction between rationality, subjectivity, and objectivity.

Te and Ti are respectively objective and subjective and both seemingly rational functions. Fe is an objective function which people may consider to be irrational as a kneejerk analysis to its feeling status.

l don't have much use for the SLOAN system, but l tend toward thinking that the misconception is equating feeling to a limbic type, which is not consistent between the two systems.

Many thinking types can be limbic as well, though limbic feelers probably manifest as more typical and contribute toward what people think ''feeling'' is.

The T/F dichotomy means very little to me currently. l'm probably balanced, but l do value being a calm SLOAN type and find l can at times become, somewhat stressed by limbic types of either persuasion.





Not too much, just a little bit.

But it's OK, never change.

Just don't be mad, alright?

Alright.
 

·
MOTM January 2013
Joined
·
10,621 Posts
This is a pretty informative article on the difference between a feeling and an emotion - Article

Feelings:
Emotions:
Feelings tell us “how to live.”Emotions tell us what we “like” and “dislike.”
Feelings state:”There is a right and wrong way to be.Emotions state:”There are good and bad actions.”
Feelings state:“your emotions matter.”Emotions state:”The external world matters.”
Feelings establish our long term attitude toward reality.Emotions establish our initial attitude toward reality.
Feelings alert us to anticipated dangers and prepares us for action.Emotion alert us to immediate dangers and prepares us for action
Feelings ensure long-term survival of self. (body and mind.)Emotions ensure immediate survival of self. (body and mind.)
Feelings are Low-key but Sustainable.Emotions are Intense but Temporary.
Happiness: is a feeling.Joy: is an emotion.
Worry: is a feeling.Fear: is an emotion.
Contentment: is a feeling.Enthusiasm: is an emotion.
Bitterness: is a feeling.Anger: is an emotion.
Love: is a feeling.Lust: is an emotion.
Depression: is a feeling.Sadness: is an emotion.

It says that emotions are shorter lived than feelings, feelings spawn from the repetition of emotions which helps give us a guide or way to live life(feeling). Feelings are the product of emotions but are longer lived and more stable.

Feeling means 'gut feeling' which is different from being upset which is the emotion. It is a reasoning process, a way of analysing the situation from an interpersonal standpoint rather than an impersonal one.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
820 Posts
I always thought of introverted judging functions as being subjective(Ti and Fi) and extroverted ones being objective (Fe and Te).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aquarian and shakti

·
Administrator
INTP
Joined
·
11,819 Posts
Feeling is emotions that are very slight/low intensity, too low to be recognised by others as 'emotional'. Nervousness can be low intensity, so you know you're feeling nervous but look confident or it can be intense enough to make you physically sick. By the time you are feeling the effects in your body, feeling has moved into the realm of feeling-sensation. Before emotions are intense enough to put into words, they represent feeling.

"When the intensity of feeling is increased, an affect results, which is a state of feeling accompanied by appreciable bodily innervations. Feeling is distinguished from affect by the fact that it gives rise to no perceptible physical innervations."

"since every feeling, after attaining a certain strength, releases physical innervations, thus becoming an affect."

"Similarly, affect is clearly distinguished from feeling by quite perceptible physical innervations, while feeling for the most part lacks them, or the intensity is so slight that they can only be demonstrated by the finest instruments, as for example the psycho-galvanic phenomenon. "
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,362 Posts
I always thought of introverted judging functions as being subjective(Ti and Fi) and extroverted ones being objective (Fe and Te).
Thank you.

IMO, the reason why people mis-understand feeling as subjective and thinking as objective is that there is a failure to see that the concepts of logic and objectivity themselves are culturally constructed. I suspect, though I'm not sure, that most people who name things this way are thinkers who don't perceive or understand the culturally constructed biases in their own primary judging function.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top