Especially, your brutal and honest thought are welcome.
You know too much!Well, I always post over there & prob get annoying but ENTP's are one of my favorites, so meh.
My thoughts on ENTP:
-Lucky you're witty because as mentioned, assholes
-Extremely confident whilst simultaneously not
-Hard shell, soft insides
-Highly intelligent. Have yet to meet one that isn't above normal intelligence. The ability is there, the motivation isn't always.
-I think many struggle with some form of addiction.
-I know you guys don't need protecting at all, but something about the type stirs a desire within me to shield. To reassure. To care for. There's a bit of a "lostness". Idk.
-Not always as open-minded as you like to think you are
-More judgemental than you think you are
-Yet accepting of all types of people & willing to give everyone a chance
-Can also write people off too quickly
-Extremely loyal & caring to those you love
-Only see value in action, not words. Which can drive me a bit bonkers.
-Goofy, the best sense of humor, but can also be very serious.
-Don't always know when to push the "Ok, time to stop teasing now" button when someone has met their limit.
-Can be guarded. Acts ok when you're not. Unwillingness to be vulnerable. Which is unfortunate, because it is absolutely beautiful when you allow yourselves to be vulnerable.
-Doesn't have feelings about something when it seems like there should be some there? Hard to explain that one.
-So curious about all of the things
-When you let your light shine on someone, it is overwhelming & warming to the core. When you take that light away, it's confusing.
-When you get Fe figured out, you are great at pushing/challenging others into growth
-Horny sons of guns
-Need reminders about boundaries
-Very good at reading people. Amazing at it. So much so it makes me uncomfortable at times. But also not always as good as you think are. (Yes I'm aware this could be a hypocritcal statement BUT YOU ASKED so these are my thoughts. I fully accept that many of these observations could be way off the mark.)
-Desire validation more than you'll ever admit
-Can have the attention span of a gnat.
-Worth all of the frustrations that may come with maintaining a friendship with you. 😄
You know too much!
You're undermining our ability to manipulate .....
(which you failed to mention btw)
But gosh, that was a scarily accurate summary.
Haha are you referring to my assessment? If so, could you please expound? You scare the shit out of me but I also see you as being straightforward & trying to get to the truth of things, so I am curious where you disagree and why. Also, why do you never tag people when you make random digs such as this? You think so lowly of them (My evaluation, in this case. I'm assuming. Correct me if I'm wrong.) that you can't be bothered? This is not meant to be a passive aggressive question, I am genuinely asking. If you take the time to give your criticism, why not give the other person the opportunity to discuss by tagging them?If that load of bullshit is an accurate summary....
Do you realize how much time I'd spend to criticize that list?Haha are you referring to my assessment? If so, could you please expound?
I do not. How much IS IT A LOT 😑Do you realize how much time I'd spend to criticize that list?
Ok. No surprises here.That's correct, I can't be bothered.
Nonsensical comparison.Besides, since you didn't inform every ENTP before talking about them, you withdrew your right to be informed when ENTPs talk about you.
Ok 👍 Yes, you did quote post me here. Thank you.However I make sure to quote when it is not obvious what I react to or when I answer a question.
Ok. I respect your wishes, that is understandable if you think that's what would happen.A lot is a lot. And considering the probability that you'll try to counter-argue most of it, it's way too fuckin much.
You confuse disappointed with offended.Don't act all offended when you call someone an asshole in the first place.
I think I would care about your feelings if they weren't garbage.You think I should?
Argue c. 1300, "to make reasoned statements to prove or refute a proposition," from Old French arguer Apr. 1170 « raisonnement destiné à prouver ou à réfuter une proposition » dér. d'arguere « démontrer » De monstrare = to show down to the bottom = down to the principle/axiom.