Too often is the phobic six simply described as always trying to stick by the side of authority, as being these little meek and compliant things that squeak when they hear the word "Rebellion". Counterphobic sixes get their misconceptions busted, so why not phobic sixes? I have my own prejudices, of course, so feel free to suggest changes. A lot of this has basically grown out of the opposite of the counterphobic threads, because the typical phobic 6 suggested doesn't sound like a natural dichotomy versus the counterphobic 6. So maybe not misconceptions so much as "If the counterphobic is like this, wouldn't it follow that the phobic is like this?". Well, anyhoo:
Misconception 1: It's all about authority
Counterphobic sixes are acknowledged as facing anxiety in all areas by trying to smash through those things that inspire it. But phobic sixes are frequently described only in their relation to authority. The anxiety of sixes, however, is noted for its pervasiveness in all things. With omnipresent anxiety means a way to deal with it everywhere. The phobic six's approach is to use their anxiety (Yes, use it. This is the irony of the six.) as a feeler, to detect areas of danger. Where the counterphobic six uses their anxiety like a scout to ferret out places to attack, the phobic six uses it to locate hazards. And when you see a hazard, you avoid it, you try to find another way around it. Sure, sure, phobic sixes often do find hazards in upsetting the guy with the big stick, but that's not the only place they can find it.
Misconception 2: Phobic 6s are extra loyal
Sorry guys, but phobic 6s are not necessarily unwilling to jump ship. Staying with a losing team is often full of problems, and the phobic 6 who can sneak out without creating a big scene (that part is key, the anxiety of turmoil can be too much) may well find it worth their while. Of course, even if fraught with anxiety, personal compunctions are able to override worries about a situation and phobic sixes don't turn turncoat at the hint of danger. Rest assured, however, that we do know when to fold em'.
Misconception 3: Phobic 6s are more afraid than counterphobic sixes
Nah, the difference is that the phobic 6s just react by attempting to circumvent fears instead of "HULK SMASH!". Both intend to solve their same worrying in some way. The phobic/counterphobic types differ in solutions, not in problems.
Misconception 1: It's all about authority
Counterphobic sixes are acknowledged as facing anxiety in all areas by trying to smash through those things that inspire it. But phobic sixes are frequently described only in their relation to authority. The anxiety of sixes, however, is noted for its pervasiveness in all things. With omnipresent anxiety means a way to deal with it everywhere. The phobic six's approach is to use their anxiety (Yes, use it. This is the irony of the six.) as a feeler, to detect areas of danger. Where the counterphobic six uses their anxiety like a scout to ferret out places to attack, the phobic six uses it to locate hazards. And when you see a hazard, you avoid it, you try to find another way around it. Sure, sure, phobic sixes often do find hazards in upsetting the guy with the big stick, but that's not the only place they can find it.
Misconception 2: Phobic 6s are extra loyal
Sorry guys, but phobic 6s are not necessarily unwilling to jump ship. Staying with a losing team is often full of problems, and the phobic 6 who can sneak out without creating a big scene (that part is key, the anxiety of turmoil can be too much) may well find it worth their while. Of course, even if fraught with anxiety, personal compunctions are able to override worries about a situation and phobic sixes don't turn turncoat at the hint of danger. Rest assured, however, that we do know when to fold em'.
Misconception 3: Phobic 6s are more afraid than counterphobic sixes
Nah, the difference is that the phobic 6s just react by attempting to circumvent fears instead of "HULK SMASH!". Both intend to solve their same worrying in some way. The phobic/counterphobic types differ in solutions, not in problems.