Enfj
This.ExFx
Unrelated, but your avatar is awesome!As an ENFP, I am not a people person, I just say my ideas out loud and use people as sound boards
Carl Jung would certainly disagree with you about that...Regarding MBTI-type, it's harder, since it's all about the cognitive process rather than how we actually act, but I'd probably say ExFJs here, ExFPs a close second. But as I said, it's not really covered by MBTI, and not supposed to be.
Jung said:[Extraverts and introverts] are so different and present such a striking contrast that their existence becomes quite obvious even to the layman once it has been pointed out. Everyone knows those reserved, inscrutable, rather shy people who form the strongest possible contrast to the open, sociable, jovial, or at least friendly and approachable characters who are on good terms with everybody, or quarrel with everybody, but always relate to them in some way and in turn are affected by them.
So now, E/I doesn't talk about which functions is dominant?Carl Jung would certainly disagree with you about that...
Is boring to most sensors as well. The difference is we hide our disinterest better.I imagine they'd probably more likely have a sensing preference in addition to extraverted and feeling, as the insignificant details and mundane parts of stranger's lives would bore most intuitives.
I have no idea what you're talking about. Why don't you think that Jung quote I posted is relevant to Pinina's post that whether or not somebody's a "people person" is "not really covered by MBTI" because "cognitive processes" doesn't relate to "how we actually act"?@reckful,why are you constantly preaching the same thing and talking about completely different things from what everyone else is talking about?
For a long discussion of what E/I's about — from Jung to Myers to Thomson, and including the relation to being "reserved and rather shy" — see this post.So now, E/I doesn't talk about which functions is dominant?
And, would that mean that my ISTP and INFJ friends are reserved and rather shy? Now you're confusing me...
I'm pretty sure about what E/I would be, I'm just curious on what you (and maybe Jung) would mean with it, cause it doesn't seem to make sense regarding my experience with people or type-theory.For a long discussion of what E/I's about — from Jung to Myers to Thomson, and including the relation to being "reserved and rather shy" — see this post.
What I and Jung "would mean with it" is what that linked post is about.I'm pretty sure about what E/I would be, I'm just curious on what you (and maybe Jung) would mean with it, cause it doesn't seem to make sense regarding my experience with people or type-theory.