Joined
·
2,742 Posts
It seems to me as though (on rottentomatoesdotcom) critics always prefer movies that are very simplistic. For example, there's a movie called Rubber, which is about a sentient tire wreaking havoc with his psychic powers (and yes, it somehow is a male).
Recently I saw A Ghost Story. It didn't make it to any cinemas near me, so I had to wait to get it on video—I thought I was going to like it. I barely survived the viewing. There was almost no dialogue (save for a faux intellectual monologue in the middle) and there was a five minute scene where the titular ghost watches his old lover eat a pie.
The whole thing seemed to come from the mind of a person who overestimates his/her own poor imagination.
Do you find that critics seem to have a unique, albeit superior taste, or do you find yourself disagreeing with them?
Recently I saw A Ghost Story. It didn't make it to any cinemas near me, so I had to wait to get it on video—I thought I was going to like it. I barely survived the viewing. There was almost no dialogue (save for a faux intellectual monologue in the middle) and there was a five minute scene where the titular ghost watches his old lover eat a pie.
The whole thing seemed to come from the mind of a person who overestimates his/her own poor imagination.
Do you find that critics seem to have a unique, albeit superior taste, or do you find yourself disagreeing with them?