Personality Cafe banner
21 - 40 of 216 Posts
I'd put money on you being an enfj.

Could you tell me what your understanding of what Fe and Fi is?


And that thread you helped the girl in? I asked her if she was sure they were istp and not istj. I don't just assume people have typed themselves and others correctly. Some people are really bad at it. What she was describing was a relation of conflict so I asked to verify.
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
I didn't say you were spreading nasty rumours. To say that makes me sound like some kind of nasty bitch. What I said was that you were spreading falsehoods.
Rumor (definition--see dictionary.com) : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts
Falsehood (definition--see dictionary.com): 1.the quality of being untrue 2.an untrue statement; lie 3.the act of deceiving or lying
By the definition of these words, nasty rumor and falsehoods are equally unethical (either I was downright lying or I was circulating information without certainty which is a rumor). Thus, your statement questioned my integrity either way.

You were calling your own theory that you made up yourself duality. It is not duality. That word has already been claimed, it is the theory that istp and enfp are duals. If you are going to make up your own theories make up names for them too so that people wont get confused. Socionics is misunderstood enough as it is.
This is a separate request. I was responding to your accusation that I lacked integrity and that my theory was completely bunk. Your accusation lacked the full picture. I created this thread to seek the reality of the situation through discussion on the topic.
 
Rumor (definition--see dictionary.com) : a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts
Falsehood (definition--see dictionary.com): 1.the quality of being untrue 2.an untrue statement; lie 3.the act of deceiving or lying
By the definition of these words, nasty rumor and falsehoods are equally unethical (either I was downright lying or I was circulating information without certainty which is a rumor). Thus, your statement questioned my integrity either way.



This is a separate request. I was responding to your accusation that I lacked integrity and that my theory was completely bunk. Your accusation lacked the full picture. I created this thread to seek the reality of the situation through discussion on the topic.



You should question your integrity because it is not true to say that enfp and istj are duals. It's just not true. You are confusing people by saying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qaellech
Discussion starter · #24 ·
I'd put money on you being an enfj.

Could you tell me what your understanding of what Fe and Fi is?


And that thread you helped the girl in? I asked her if she was sure they were istp and not istj. I don't just assume people have typed themselves and others correctly. Some people are really bad at it. What she was describing was a relation of conflict so I asked to verify.
Well, I just took the socionics test and got ENFP! Crazy!

http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta-1-r.html?ENFP:fALdb_IJbhK.jnM,GBVbs(s/$VzoaGIzoysZe1tv:XTdZvl2sf4www1UU4ryn3j1ibrsj2w:

And then I took about a million other tests and always get ENFP!
If you are an INFJ, keep in mind your definition of Fe is going to be my definition of Fi.
If you had actually read through my argument in it's entirety, you would know my definitions of Fe vs. Fi but yeah here's the link again to my views on the matter:
http://personalitycafe.com/cognitive-functions/59773-fe-fi-when-emotional-palettes-collide.html
 
Well, I just took the socionics test and got ENFP! Crazy!

http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta-1-r.html?ENFP:fALdb_IJbhK.jnM,GBVbs(s/$VzoaGIzoysZe1tv:XTdZvl2sf4www1UU4ryn3j1ibrsj2w:

And then I took about a million other tests and always get ENFP!
If you are an INFJ, keep in mind your definition of Fe is going to be my definition of Fi.
If you had actually read through my argument in it's entirety, you would know my definitions of Fe vs. Fi but yeah here's the link again to my views on the matter:
http://personalitycafe.com/cognitive-functions/59773-fe-fi-when-emotional-palettes-collide.html
Keep in mind if I'm an infj my definition of Fe is going to be Fi? And what would make you think I'm an infj?
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
The point is to get you to see that an enfj would be better for an istj.
Why?
I have seen it. I did entertain the notion. I'm a notional person. However, I experimented, tested it, and now I'm reworking the theory. I tried as hard as you are right now to prove it correct. It must be correct!!!!
But the fact is that when the theory is proven wrong, the theory must reworked. To do the same experiment a million times expecting different results is madness. Absolute madness.

EIEs are naturally animate and passionate and are skilled at generating liveliness and excitement. They believe that people need to be emotionally involved in life, not distant or indifferent to the important things that are happening.
they like to imagine scenarios of different ways a situation can unfold with their imagination; such actions give them a sense of security about what is to come. EIEs are very open about their feelings of hesitation, apprehension, anticipation, and anxiety regarding events. Sometimes they are melodramatic about risks and dangers, but this helps them and those around them to be aware of and to prepare for possible negative turns of events.
Which the ISTP is lacking and would benefit from. Furthermore, the ISTP doesn't like when his integrity is questioned. ENFPs and ISTJs question talk about ethical obligations all the time which is offensive to both ISTP and ENFJ.

IEEs' avoidance of commitment and general air of uncertainty and unpredictability can grate on some people — especially those who are trying to organize people for some joint task and need participants to follow certain conventions and behave predictably and obediently.
This is good between an ENFP and ISTJ couple because ISTJs are willing to bend the rules for the ENFP which means that the ISTJ in order to fulfill his/her duty to the ENFP grows to be more flexible. Similarly, because the ENFP knows that he wants things more concrete, the ENFP starts making goals and starts making back up plans. Which btw, both are recommended to do for personal growth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qaellech
  • Like
Reactions: Qaellech and JimmyD
Why?
I have seen it. I did entertain the notion. I'm a notional person. However, I experimented, tested it, and now I'm reworking the theory. I tried as hard as you are right now to prove it correct. It must be correct!!!!
But the fact is that when the theory is proven wrong, the theory must reworked. To do the same experiment a million times expecting different results is madness. Absolute madness.



Which the ISTP is lacking and would benefit from. Furthermore, the ISTP doesn't like when his integrity is questioned. ENFPs and ISTJs question talk about ethical obligations all the time which is offensive to both ISTP and ENFJ.



This is good between an ENFP and ISTJ couple because ISTJs are willing to bend the rules for the ENFP which means that the ISTJ in order to fulfill his/her duty to the ENFP grows to be more flexible. Similarly, because the ENFP knows that he wants things more concrete, the ENFP starts making goals and starts making back up plans. Which btw, both are recommended to do for personal growth.
Ok I will go and trawl the forums and show you how wrong you are. Istj's are not willing to bend the rules for enfp's. They will do it for an enfj however because they only bend the rules slightly, we take the rule book, lay a warm one on the cover and throw it out the fucking window. This dosorientates the istj, where is my precious rule book? he exclaims, what rule book retorts the enfp, fuck you and fuck your shitty rule book.
 
We're trying to establish if she is enfj in Socionics not mbti. Well I am anyway, she seems positive she's enfp.
*shrugs*

You should capitalize it, then. You know? ENFp/ENFP? Work with me here, honey.

On the other hand, it's kind of irrelevant. The shadow functions are out in full force for this one. An obsessive, mad detective ISTJ.

Furthermore-are you sure you're not an ENTP, Potato? 'Cause all you do is argue. It's what you live for--You approach it as a sport.
 
Discussion starter · #33 ·
Ok I will go and trawl the forums and show you how wrong you are. Istj's are not willing to bend the rules for enfp's. They will do it for an enfj however because they only bend the rules slightly, we take the rule book, lay a warm one on the cover and throw it out the fucking window. This dosorientates the istj, where is my precious rule book? he exclaims, what rule book retorts the enfp, fuck you and fuck your shitty rule book.
Not any enfp. Only one he is in love with. I've seen it happen!!!!!!!!!
 
Discussion starter · #34 ·
*shrugs*

You should capitalize it, then. You know? ENFp/ENFP? Work with me here, honey.

On the other hand, it's kind of irrelevant. The shadow functions are out in full force for this one. An obsessive, mad detective ISTJ.

Furthermore-are you sure you're not an ENTP, Potato? 'Cause all you do is argue. It's what you live for--You approach it as a sport.
Thank you, Duck :) I like being called a detective. I have considered it as a profession. I'm considering it again. :)
The shadow functions are in full force. Oh, Duck, you are awesome. :D
You brightened my day.
Thank you for your tests, too. I'm borderline ENTP/ENFP. Probably has to do with my inner ISTJ inflamed by being accused of lying.
 
Discussion starter · #35 ·
Ok I will go and trawl the forums and show you how wrong you are. Istj's are not willing to bend the rules for enfp's. They will do it for an enfj however because they only bend the rules slightly, we take the rule book, lay a warm one on the cover and throw it out the fucking window. This dosorientates the istj, where is my precious rule book? he exclaims, what rule book retorts the enfp, fuck you and fuck your shitty rule book.
Hey, now I like rules. If there weren't rules, we wouldn't have taboo ;)
 
*shrugs*

You should capitalize it, then. You know? ENFp/ENFP? Work with me here, honey.

On the other hand, it's kind of irrelevant. The shadow functions are out in full force for this one. An obsessive, mad detective ISTJ.

Furthermore-are you sure you're not an ENTP, Potato? 'Cause all you do is argue. It's what you live for--You approach it as a sport.
No I'm definately not an entp. I just believe Socionics to be right and it gets on my nerves when people misquote things. I don't like falsehoods being spread about any subject I am passionate about or any subject for that matter. Where did you get the idea that all I like to do is argue? I speak my mind if I disagree with someone, I've been disagreeing with a few people lately because of the confusion around Socionics.

ENFp's are natural detectives and will become obsesive about anything that interests them, so if she was an ENFp this wouldn't be shadow type behaviour. I'm suspecting she is ENFj because of how she twisted me saying she was spreading falsehoods into me saying she was spreading nasty rumours. There is a completely different connotation attatched to the term nasty rumours.


EIEs generally don't use their persuasion tactics for manipulative gain over others (as much of their sense of self-worth comes from impacting people positively), but they've been known to use these tactics negatively in cases where they cannot win approval of their arguments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qaellech
Thank you, Duck :) I like being called a detective. I have considered it as a profession. I'm considering it again. :)
The shadow functions are in full force. Oh, Duck, you are awesome. :D
You brightened my day.
Thank you for your tests, too. I'm borderline ENTP/ENFP. Probably has to do with my inner ISTJ inflamed by being accused of lying.
But you tried to pass your theory of istj's and enfp's being perfect for each other off as duality. You can't call it that! The theory of duality belongs to Socionics, your theory is your own that you made up yourself. It's not duality so it is a lie to call it that. It misleads people.

I'm not here to go out of my way to get under your skin, that's duck stirring the shit. But YOU have gotten under my skin by calling your theory duality. It's not duality, it's your own theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qaellech
21 - 40 of 216 Posts