I am absolutely stuck on the Sabba Sutta from the Samyutta Nikaya. Here's Wallis' translation of it.
"This was spoken by the Buddha at Savatthi.
I will teach you the all. Listen to what I have to say.
What is the all? The eye and forms, the ear and sounds, the nose and scents, the tongue and tastes, the body and tactile objects, the mind and thoughts. This is called the all.
Someone might say, 'I reject this all, I will declare another all.' But because that is simply a groundless assertion, such a person, when asked about it, would not be able to explain, and would, moreover, meet with distress. What is the reason for that distress? Because that all is not within his or her sensorium."
When I say "empirical" I mean that which can be verified within "the all," bringing no more into the discussion other than what one can verify through observation. By "empirical" I also mean "that which is self-evident for those who observe carefully". I suppose "empirical," in the sense that I use it, also means "anti-metaphysical" and "without contrivance."
On a similar note, I would unhesitatingly add that disconnection and alienation most definitely stem from spending too much time outside of "the all" in the abstract space of consciousness. As The Buddha states, spending time here results in distress. Tragically, for the INTP, alienation from the body leads to distrust in "the all." Learning how to sympathetically and spontaneously reengage reality seems to be the nature of our quest. Thus my interest and advocacy of yoga and meditation.