Wow thanks for the answers! Perhaps I'm one of you
I'll think about it ^^
How much do you agree with this:
An INTP Profile ?
I saw me as an INFP when I learned about MBTI but all this emotional, personally offended, good with relationships etc. didn't really fit. Then I was totally satisfied with the INTP description above.
However it was lately suggested that I would be more Fi dom and not Ti (in socionics) because I didn't answered with definitions in the 80Q thread

(
http://personalitycafe.com/whats-my-socionics-type/355090-80q-do-you-agree-my-type.html#post12813114 )
(For those who are not familiar with socioncs: INTPs are sometimes LIIs and INFPs are sometimes EII. Functions have the same name but can be different in their definition)
I have to say that definitions are not very important to me. I always thought that my values come from the 4wing but that Fi is more about relationships and analyzing their feelings (I'm a very detached type 5 so I often don't really know what I'm feeling

) But I could see that I have a Fi function under all this detachement ^^. Or you are all Ti doms

haha
5) How do you see INTPs?
- Scary!!
They come across as insensitive sometimes. I actually come across as INTP irl because I don't normally share my values and feelings with anyone. I'm always analyzing things out loud and I think that throws off people a bit.
In what way are they insensitive? Do they behave wrong somehow? Are they too hard in their decisions? Are they oblivious to other feelings? Do you have examples?
Hm... I think I come across as INFP in real life but actually have a very logical core inside. But I'm never really showing it on the outside, I guess I don't like disharmony in my environnement. Instead I now wrote a lot about like and dislike in my questionnaire.
Is that a difference between Fi-Te and Ti-Fe? Fi-Te actually sensitive inside but then being totally blunt (Te). And Ti-Fe strict on the inside but need harmony on the outside? I definitely identify more with the latter but I don't know if INFPs are usually that blunt? But I heard that INFPs as Te users are better in academic institutions because they kinda like the "Te structure" there. Hmm...
1) I'd like to know how much you're identifying with Fi and/or Ti function?
Fi all the way, Ti is like a mystery that I'd really like to understand more of. I think of Ti as "Lawyer logic".
Oh that's interesting, why lawyer logic? I rather see Te as lawyer logic and Ti not at all. Because lawyer logic is very strict with standardized rules, right? They have all these rules and acting on them Perhaps that more Te-Si actually. I would see me (and thus Ti doms) as someone who rather has fun destroying those rules because their own rules are more important (could be Ne in it though). Like for Fi doms I always think their feelings are more important for them than keeping the fe harmony in their environnement where people please others etc. What do you think? And could you describe lawyer logic a bit more from your point of view?
4) How do you differ from other INFPs?
Other INFPs seem to BE their feelings whilst I FEEL my feelings.
Help! I don't even feel them! It sounds like a stupid question to ask what are feelings, so I rather ask: what are feelings for you? ^^ Well now that they told me in the 80Q thread that I talk a lot about what I like and dislike I have to say that I never really
feel that but just say it because... I don't know... I learned it? I tend to say: "It's funny that this and that happened" but I'm not really feeling that it was funny but I'm just enthousiatic that I made an observation... okay that's kinda hard to explain xD I'll stop that here. What are feelings for you and how do you experience them? ^^
I have to say that I'm good at not hurting other people feelings. I tend to say nothing instead of hurting them

Can you actually give very good emotional support to people? Because for me it's really a weak point. I just don't know how to help them and I don't even like hugging people, so I'm actually quite a cold person but not intentionally, and usually they are not open to logical solutions. Like someone lost his boyfriend and is crying. I really cannot handle those situations. I could only say: "Well there are so many nice men out there, the chance is big you'll find a new one.. okay okay.. I know he was unique yeah... but you have to get over that.. I know it's hard but he won't come back... so don't be sad for the rest of your life... that's not worth it"
But usually I'm not in those situations because they would never come to me for emotional support xD
5) How do you see INTPs?
I respect them a whole lot thanks to their unwavering confidence in their logic and willingness to go against convention but face to face interaction is really difficult.
Why is face to face interaction difficult? Okay with me it would be really difficult because I'm usually defending my room by not letting anybody in but.. (and when you come in I probably wouldn't talk to you *awkward silence* xD )
I've not really so much confidence in my logic.. I'm always like "on the one hand... on the other hand..." it could be... maybe... is there really a truth? ... We cannot be sure... blahblah
But I observed there are INTPs (usually they are INTJ-like and often enneagram 5w6's) who are much more into logic and their statements. I don't like that so much either.
5) How do you see INTPs?
Used to test as one more (as a teenager), and am friends with INTPs. As long as their feeling isn't TOO underdeveloped i love their thirst for knowledge and love for thinking, which I share.
What happens if it's too underdeveloped? Are they too critical? Too insensitive? Do they get angry quickly?
Do they think everyone else is stupid? ^^
7) Do you need internal structure? Like structuring your thoughts or that you need everything to make sense somehow (explanations why something is like it is) or can you also accept things which have not really an explanation?
Yeah I think so...like I need to have some internal logical framework, even if it changes over time.
BTW love how analytical you are about it! It sounds kinda like how I'd investigate or learn about the topic, but in more depth!
Why in more depth? There is this theory in timeless' description that INTPs type 5's are more into details and INFP's type 5 more about the essence and then move on. It was described as the opposite but I don't see it. I cannot really decide which one I am. I'm not a very detailed oriented person.
Introverted Thinking Types (INTP, ISTP)
Introverted Thinking types (IxTP) emphasize the particular meanings of words and how each individual piece fits together within a concept. Introverted Thinking Type Fives do not have the wide array of observations that an Extroverted Intuitive Type Five might, but they analyze their observations in such great detail that they can easily get lost in their own head. For this reason, IxTP Fives are probably the most introverted of the introverted types.
Contrast:
ENxP – Many observations, quick to discard the ones that seem false. (Tendency toward brainstorming)
IxTP – Fewer observations, but analyzed in great detail, only thrown out after substantial analysis. (Tendency toward detailed exploration)
Introverted Feeling Types (INFP, ISFP)
Introverted Feeling types are concerned more about the essence of a particular subject than the gritty particulars. (This is the opposite for Introverted Thinking types.) As a result, an IxFP Five may move from subject to subject, gathering what they consider is the essence and moving along quickly. They may not see the little details as important, thus making them think that they couldn’t be a Five because Five is traditionally associated with Introverted Thinking-like behavior. However, this is not the case.
source:
http://personalitycafe.com/type-5-f...ype-5-forum-investigator/65605-type-five-investigator-timeless-description.html
I'm definitely the most introverted introvert I know ^^ and always lost in my head. But I think INFP are like this, too?
How does your logical framework change?
So I'll make a pause here. But I'll come back later and analyze your posts in great detail
Quite interesting what you're wrinting here
