lilacleia16
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | ** (38.6) excellent use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (43) excellent use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | **** (16.5) limited use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | ** (18.1) limited use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | ** (34.6) good use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | ** (38.5) excellent use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | *** (11.5) unused |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | ** (38.6) |
I'm such a sensor.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | **** (32.4) good use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | *** (11.8) unused |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | *** (47.6) excellent use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | *** (35.3) good use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | **** (28.2) average use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | ** (46.8) excellent use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | ** (18.9) limited use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (19.2) limited use |
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENTP
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: INTP, or ESTP
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Theorist; secondly Improviser; then Catalyst; and lastly, Stabilizer.
To read more about the four temperaments click here.
I should like to mention here that I've been at this a very long time and I'm relatively certain I can pretty much figure out what responses correspond to what function, so I often wonder if I am manipulating the tests to get the preferred outcome. I may or may not be the most intelligent person in the room, but I've got a lot of life experience, I'm well-educated, and I'm really clever.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | ** (14) unused |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | **** (28.1) average use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | * (21.5) limited use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | ** (42.8) excellent use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | * (25.8) average use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | * (29.8) average use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | ** (26.1) average use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (51.7) excellent use |
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INFP
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENFP, or INFJ
Lol, I got ESTP even though I'm INTP.
![Image]()
I'm not going to deny that I have a good use of Se, something like Ti-Ne=Se would make sense, which would actually be weird because they are functions that, although they do the same thing, they do it in very opposite ways.
I'm not going to deny that I have a good use of Se, something like Ti-Ne=Se would make sense, which would actually be weird because they are functions that, although they do the same thing, they do it in very opposite ways.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | *** (23.3) limited use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (30) average use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | *** (27.5) average use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | * (25.1) average use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | ** (22) limited use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | *** (43.3) excellent use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | * (21.1) limited use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (47.5) excellent use |
After you take this test, find out your subtype on this post. How to find your MBTI subtype. I posted everyone's results that is above this post.
extraverted Sensing (Se) *** (35.6)
good use
introverted Sensing (Si) *** (28.2)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) * (35.5)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *** (28.9)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ** (15.9)
unused
introverted Thinking (Ti) *** (33.5)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ** (15.2)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi)** (47.6)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISFP
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Feeling (Fi): Staying true to who you really are. Paying close attention to your personal identity, values and beliefs. Checking with your conscience. Choosing behavior congruent with what is important to you.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Sensing (Se): Immersing in the present context. Responding naturally to everything tangible you detect through your senses. Checking with what your gut instincts say. Testing limits and take risks for big rewards.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ESFP, or INFP
I disagree with the results! I really use Fi, but not too much compared with the results.
good use
introverted Sensing (Si) *** (28.2)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) * (35.5)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *** (28.9)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ** (15.9)
unused
introverted Thinking (Ti) *** (33.5)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ** (15.2)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi)** (47.6)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISFP
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Feeling (Fi): Staying true to who you really are. Paying close attention to your personal identity, values and beliefs. Checking with your conscience. Choosing behavior congruent with what is important to you.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Sensing (Se): Immersing in the present context. Responding naturally to everything tangible you detect through your senses. Checking with what your gut instincts say. Testing limits and take risks for big rewards.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ESFP, or INFP
I disagree with the results! I really use Fi, but not too much compared with the results.
I am baffled that I use more Fi than Fe. But that explains a lot. Also my excellent use of Te, that confuses the heck out of every test I have taken.
Yup, the same ones I always get, infp, enfp and intp and my Ne is always highest and My Se and Te is always crap
I have a very hard time understanding text or anything that is too technical or too textbook tone…I need example, comparison to understand…its too robotic like reading a technical manual written by a hardcore engineer…I just will have to read it over and over and over and still not understand
like this question from this test ( and there were a few like this)…..
42. Stick to making decisions based on impersonal measures such as points earned.
like what does that even mean, what the hell is it even talking about….. I need an example what I would even use this bc idk…..”points earned” what the hell is that…and why would I care about points..…i Don’t understand this at all…
![Image]()
![Image]()
I have a very hard time understanding text or anything that is too technical or too textbook tone…I need example, comparison to understand…its too robotic like reading a technical manual written by a hardcore engineer…I just will have to read it over and over and over and still not understand
like this question from this test ( and there were a few like this)…..
42. Stick to making decisions based on impersonal measures such as points earned.
like what does that even mean, what the hell is it even talking about….. I need an example what I would even use this bc idk…..”points earned” what the hell is that…and why would I care about points..…i Don’t understand this at all…
42. is a Te question...its why you don't understand it. I don't really either except I have seen Te doms get excited over sports and who's got the highest score.
Also why did the test give you INFP which is Fi Ne when you are clearly Ne Fi which is ENFP?
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| Extraverted Sensing (Se) | * (21.9) limited use |
| Introverted Sensing (Si) | * (20.8) limited use |
| Extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | *** (36) good use |
| Introverted Intuiting (Ni) | **** (43.2) excellent use |
| Extraverted Thinking (Te) | ** (28) average use |
| Introverted Thinking (Ti) | ** (30) average use |
| Extraverted Feeling (Fe) | ** (35) good use |
| Introverted Feeling (Fi) | ** (25.9) average use |
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENFJ
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: INFJ, or ENTJ
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Catalyst; secondly Theorist; then Stabilizer; and lastly, Improviser.
Thank you, @lilacleia16 . I'm pretty sure my cognitive functions are what they're supposed to be for my type (Ti Ne Si Fe).
I wanted to do the test for fun and to join the discussion. But as it turned out, the test wasn't fun and didn't even give me a result.
I wanted to do the test for fun and to join the discussion. But as it turned out, the test wasn't fun and didn't even give me a result.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | * (41.2) excellent use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (54.6) excellent use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | * (13.8) unused |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | * (5.8) unused |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | **** (52.6) excellent use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | *** (31) good use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | * (5.8) unused |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (35) good use |
Da fuq
Don't think so.
ENFJ? INFJ?
ENTJ, maybe.
These tests are redic.
Your cognitive profile is presented below. It is based on how you rated described yourself. A 4-letter personality type code is also presented for your convenience if you are familiar with that framework. Most people find their results match their 4-letter personality type code. That is, we tend to develop and utilize what we prefer and vice versa. As you reflect on your cognitive profile, keep in mind that sometimes we develop a cognitive process to meet the demands of our environment or use a process well in one area of our lives but not others.
The Eight Processes
Swiss psychiatrist Dr. Carl Jung identified four mental functions. Today we know them as cognitive processes. We focus our attention and gather information using Sensing (S) and iNtuiting (N), and we organize our experiences and make decisions using Thinking (T) and Feeling (F). Jung described how each of these four processes plays out in a person's "internal world" (I) of thoughts, feelings, memories, and imagination; and in the "external world" (E) of actions, people, tools, and organizations. Thus, there are eight cognitive processes (Se, Si, Ne, Ni, Te, Ti, Fe, Fi).
Basic and Developed Use
Each cognitive process can be engaged in a basic, unsophisticated way reflecting our natural human capabilities. Almost everyone can engage each process in some basic way. We often do every day. Beyond this, you will engage some cognitive processes in a more sophisticated, developed way. This is likely the result of innate preference plus lifelong growth and practice, which equals development.
Perceiving — how we focus our attention and gather information
Your Cognitive Development Profile
The forty-eight questions you rated earlier tap into the eight cognitive processes. Some questions tapped into basic or developed use of a process used by itself, while other questions tapped into use of multiple processes at once. The profile below is based on your responses. The number of squares indicate strength of response. The equivalent numeric is shown in parentheses along with likely level of development.
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENFJ
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Catalyst; secondly Theorist; then Improviser; and lastly, Stabilizer.
To read more about the four temperaments click here.
Aligning to Sixteen Patterns
Jung observed that everyone has potential access to all eight cognitive processes but that we each prefer one as dominant — playing a lead role —with a second process playing a support role. Your two preferred cognitive processes allow you to do information gathering and decision making, introverting and extraverting. Maybe you prefer introverted Intuiting in a lead role with extraverted Feeling in a support role, or maybe you prefer extraverted Sensing in a lead role with introverted Thinking in a support role. Or maybe you prefer some other pairing. These pairings tap into sixteen possible patterns which are often represented using a 4-letter code. Here are the sixteen type patterns and the preferred cognitive processes associated with each:
This assessment underwent rigorous development with over 3000 people, and recent further validation with almost 130,000 respondents confirms validity. We used various validation methods, namely latent class analysis (with Cronbach alpha >= 0.70). You can consider your results here as valid as those from any professionally-developed assessment. You can read more here:
In the original study, people who took this assessment and reported their 4-letter type code received results that matched their type code 75% to 80% of the time. This is excellent performance since the reported type may be inaccurate even when "validated" or from a professional assessment. And even when the type code does not exactly match, the central functional pair (e.g. SF, ST, NF, NT) matches 95% of the time.
Clarifying Your Result
What if the 4-letter code reported here is different from what you expected? Let's say that your type code result here is ESTP and the type you are familiar with for yourself is INTJ. Even though the type codes look quite different, you may have rated the cognitive processes for these two types rather closely. Also, keep in mind the cognitive profile is based on your responses. Continuing with the example, if you didn't think of yourself as an ESTP, then you would reflect on why you rated highly a phrase such as "freely follow your gut instincts and exciting physical impulses as they come up." This phrase clearly does not fit with the INTJ type pattern. Please visit www.bestfittype.com for more information and exploration.
Further Exploration
Here are some resources in hardcopy and e-book format to further understand your profile and the framework in general:
Copyright Dario Nardi, 2007, 2021. Please contact service [@] radiancehouse.com to use or translate material on this site.
Don't think so.
ENFJ? INFJ?
ENTJ, maybe.
These tests are redic.
Your Cognitive Profile
Understanding Your ResultsYour cognitive profile is presented below. It is based on how you rated described yourself. A 4-letter personality type code is also presented for your convenience if you are familiar with that framework. Most people find their results match their 4-letter personality type code. That is, we tend to develop and utilize what we prefer and vice versa. As you reflect on your cognitive profile, keep in mind that sometimes we develop a cognitive process to meet the demands of our environment or use a process well in one area of our lives but not others.
The Eight Processes
Swiss psychiatrist Dr. Carl Jung identified four mental functions. Today we know them as cognitive processes. We focus our attention and gather information using Sensing (S) and iNtuiting (N), and we organize our experiences and make decisions using Thinking (T) and Feeling (F). Jung described how each of these four processes plays out in a person's "internal world" (I) of thoughts, feelings, memories, and imagination; and in the "external world" (E) of actions, people, tools, and organizations. Thus, there are eight cognitive processes (Se, Si, Ne, Ni, Te, Ti, Fe, Fi).
Basic and Developed Use
Each cognitive process can be engaged in a basic, unsophisticated way reflecting our natural human capabilities. Almost everyone can engage each process in some basic way. We often do every day. Beyond this, you will engage some cognitive processes in a more sophisticated, developed way. This is likely the result of innate preference plus lifelong growth and practice, which equals development.
Perceiving — how we focus our attention and gather information
Judging — how we organize our experiences and make decisions
Development is more than basic or advanced use of processes in isolation. We can talk about a spectrum. Wise use of a cognitive process involves both basic and developed use as appropriate, plus an ability to deploy other processes in its service. Thus, thinking of a spectrum, "average" to "good" use usually means we can use the process in limited situations or use it well but only with the aid of other processes. In contrast, "poor" use means merely basic use or maybe inappropriate use. Finally, we may get ourselves into trouble when we don't utilize a process at all.
Your Cognitive Development Profile
The forty-eight questions you rated earlier tap into the eight cognitive processes. Some questions tapped into basic or developed use of a process used by itself, while other questions tapped into use of multiple processes at once. The profile below is based on your responses. The number of squares indicate strength of response. The equivalent numeric is shown in parentheses along with likely level of development.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | * (29) average use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | **** (24) average use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | **** (32.2) good use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | * (37.4) excellent use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | * (25.1) average use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | * (29.1) average use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | *** (35.3) good use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | **** (28.1) average use |
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENFJ
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: INFJ, or ENTJ
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Catalyst; secondly Theorist; then Improviser; and lastly, Stabilizer.
To read more about the four temperaments click here.
Aligning to Sixteen Patterns
Jung observed that everyone has potential access to all eight cognitive processes but that we each prefer one as dominant — playing a lead role —with a second process playing a support role. Your two preferred cognitive processes allow you to do information gathering and decision making, introverting and extraverting. Maybe you prefer introverted Intuiting in a lead role with extraverted Feeling in a support role, or maybe you prefer extraverted Sensing in a lead role with introverted Thinking in a support role. Or maybe you prefer some other pairing. These pairings tap into sixteen possible patterns which are often represented using a 4-letter code. Here are the sixteen type patterns and the preferred cognitive processes associated with each:
Validity and Reliability of Results
This assessment underwent rigorous development with over 3000 people, and recent further validation with almost 130,000 respondents confirms validity. We used various validation methods, namely latent class analysis (with Cronbach alpha >= 0.70). You can consider your results here as valid as those from any professionally-developed assessment. You can read more here:
In the original study, people who took this assessment and reported their 4-letter type code received results that matched their type code 75% to 80% of the time. This is excellent performance since the reported type may be inaccurate even when "validated" or from a professional assessment. And even when the type code does not exactly match, the central functional pair (e.g. SF, ST, NF, NT) matches 95% of the time.
Clarifying Your Result
What if the 4-letter code reported here is different from what you expected? Let's say that your type code result here is ESTP and the type you are familiar with for yourself is INTJ. Even though the type codes look quite different, you may have rated the cognitive processes for these two types rather closely. Also, keep in mind the cognitive profile is based on your responses. Continuing with the example, if you didn't think of yourself as an ESTP, then you would reflect on why you rated highly a phrase such as "freely follow your gut instincts and exciting physical impulses as they come up." This phrase clearly does not fit with the INTJ type pattern. Please visit www.bestfittype.com for more information and exploration.
Further Exploration
Here are some resources in hardcopy and e-book format to further understand your profile and the framework in general:
- 8 Keys to Self-Leadership: From Awareness to Action by Dario Nardi
- Neuroscience of Personality: Brain-Savvy Insights for All Types of People by Dario Nardi
- 16 Personality Types: Descriptions for Self-Discovery by Linda Berens and Dario Nardi
- Understanding Yourself and Others: An Introduction to the Personality Type Code by Linda Berens and Dario Nardi
- Quick Guide to the 16 Types in Organizations by Linda Berens, Dario Nardi, et al.
- The Magic Diamond: Jung's 8 Paths for Self-Coaching by Dario Nardi
- Personality Types app for Apple iPhone
Copyright Dario Nardi, 2007, 2021. Please contact service [@] radiancehouse.com to use or translate material on this site.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | *** (43.6) excellent use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (38.5) excellent use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | **** (20.9) limited use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | *** (15.8) unused |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | * (29.2) average use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | **** (24.1) average use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | **** (24.1) average use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (43.4) excellent use |
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISFP
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ESFP, or ISTP
I don't know my type but this suggests INFP, ENFP and INFJ. I'm very strongly introverted so I think it's INFx.
I took another one after 2 weeks
Your Cognitive Development Profile
The forty-eight questions you rated earlier tap into the eight cognitive processes. Some questions tapped into basic or developed use of a process used by itself, while other questions tapped into use of multiple processes at once. The profile below is based on your responses. The number of squares indicate strength of response. The equivalent numeric is shown in parentheses along with likely level of development.
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ** (26)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) **** (20.9)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ** (30.2)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ** (42.5)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *** (19.9)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) * (29.1)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ** (42.5)
excellent use
introverted Feeling (Fi) **** (28.1)
average use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INFJ
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Intuiting (Ni): Transforming with a meta-perspective. Withdrawing from the world and focusing your mind to receive an insight or realization. Checking if synergy results. Trying out a realization to transform things.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Feeling (Fe): Building trust through giving relationships. Empathically responding to others' needs and take on their needs and values as your own. Checking for respect and trust. Giving and receiving support to grow closer to people.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENFJ, or ISFJ
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Catalyst; secondly Theorist; then Improviser; and lastly, Stabilizer.
Damn, my Te is so bad 😭. I really need it.
| Cognitive Process | Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) |
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | **** (24.9) average use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (22.6) limited use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | * (25.7) average use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | **** (44.9) excellent use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | ** (42.2) excellent use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | *** (31.7) good use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | *** (3.3) unused |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | **** (44.9) excellent use |
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTJ
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENTJ, or INFP
I think there was some cheating with Fe. Where has it gone?
| extraverted Sensing (Se) | **** (20.2) limited use |
| introverted Sensing (Si) | ** (34.3) good use |
| extraverted Intuiting (Ne) | **** (36.3) excellent use |
| introverted Intuiting (Ni) | *** (27.1) average use |
| extraverted Thinking (Te) | *** (31.4) good use |
| introverted Thinking (Ti) | **** (24.1) average use |
| extraverted Feeling (Fe) | ** (27) average use |
| introverted Feeling (Fi) | *** (39.4) |
So I'm an INFP with an INFJ shadow. Well that's a new one.
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
