I surely am not the first to talk about that but,
I really don't like the stereotype we have in the typing community of the INFPs
It affects the subreddit of INFPs which are polluated of people who feel different. It's sad for them but actually it is pretty reductive for the real INFPs
Few problems I saw in the typing community:
- First, INFPs that self stereotype themselves: for example, the one topic about INFPs that say they don't like to have their personality because of this or that or people saying INFPs is a bad (I saw that on a french forum)
No you just don't like yourself. People are just able of change and having a progression in their personality there is no fatality.
-Second, the content of the stereotype: INFPs are an emotional mess, their Fi is crazy!!
Also, we use the term "healthy" INFPs from "unhealthy" INFPs or "Fi" as if they were an objective healthy and unhealthy just because being emotional means irrational in this society but even T are motivated by emotions (just as the rest of humans actually). Not cool. We don't really use the healthy and unhealthy for others cognitive function (except Ni I think)
The second statement implies that:
- INFPs can't think because if they can't think they aren't emotional (
Which implies that:
There is no INFP philosopher and thinker or scientific... if they are they have to be INTP.... 😤😤 For example I think Blaise Pascal could be an obvious Fi user.
- Political INFPs cannot exist.😐 If they exist they are necessarily artists. For example, Jesus and Buddha are typed INFJs. It makes absolutely no sense to me because both were political and ideology revolutionaries. INFJs use Fe and so previously and existing moralities to strive. They would mostly be brahman or temple To me, only a strong Fi can create people like Buddha and Jesus;
Even if I am wrong, the imaginary ways of seing INFPs is reductive.
Being introvert intuitives, INFP have obviously a strong sense of ethics and I am furious to be reduce to an emo artsy individual. Sometimes, it's just that people are unfair with INFPs way of seeing the world or how they percieve the world. 😒
My solipsism was severely mistreat as "a crazy idea" I must avowed much people lack arguments against me actually even if I learn a lot from others.
Yes I write and am artistic, but I am also capable of being passionate by sociology, cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, politics, philosophy, physics, etc.
These stereotypes often made me doubt I was INFPs but I am not mistyped. Sometimes this community is very wrong.
I really don't like the stereotype we have in the typing community of the INFPs
It affects the subreddit of INFPs which are polluated of people who feel different. It's sad for them but actually it is pretty reductive for the real INFPs
Few problems I saw in the typing community:
- First, INFPs that self stereotype themselves: for example, the one topic about INFPs that say they don't like to have their personality because of this or that or people saying INFPs is a bad (I saw that on a french forum)
No you just don't like yourself. People are just able of change and having a progression in their personality there is no fatality.
-Second, the content of the stereotype: INFPs are an emotional mess, their Fi is crazy!!
Also, we use the term "healthy" INFPs from "unhealthy" INFPs or "Fi" as if they were an objective healthy and unhealthy just because being emotional means irrational in this society but even T are motivated by emotions (just as the rest of humans actually). Not cool. We don't really use the healthy and unhealthy for others cognitive function (except Ni I think)
The second statement implies that:
- INFPs can't think because if they can't think they aren't emotional (
Which implies that:
There is no INFP philosopher and thinker or scientific... if they are they have to be INTP.... 😤😤 For example I think Blaise Pascal could be an obvious Fi user.
- Political INFPs cannot exist.😐 If they exist they are necessarily artists. For example, Jesus and Buddha are typed INFJs. It makes absolutely no sense to me because both were political and ideology revolutionaries. INFJs use Fe and so previously and existing moralities to strive. They would mostly be brahman or temple To me, only a strong Fi can create people like Buddha and Jesus;
Even if I am wrong, the imaginary ways of seing INFPs is reductive.
Being introvert intuitives, INFP have obviously a strong sense of ethics and I am furious to be reduce to an emo artsy individual. Sometimes, it's just that people are unfair with INFPs way of seeing the world or how they percieve the world. 😒
My solipsism was severely mistreat as "a crazy idea" I must avowed much people lack arguments against me actually even if I learn a lot from others.
Yes I write and am artistic, but I am also capable of being passionate by sociology, cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, politics, philosophy, physics, etc.
These stereotypes often made me doubt I was INFPs but I am not mistyped. Sometimes this community is very wrong.