I am sorry if there are some typos, and grammatical mistakes (I hope not) It's hard to write this in another language than my native language.
tl;dr (but please read it) - How do you convey thoughts to others when you must* that are constantly misunderstood in its deepest meaning? (I don't know if this question makes sense to you, I hope it will.).
*assignments, life in general
This is a problem I fight with constantly. I have only recently started to analyze this problem. It seems to be that the logical possibility is enough for me, I don't need a direct proof, or it to be the case in a situation where you don't know what is the case (only the logical possibility that it could be the case is enough - it's a proof for me.) <--this is the problem, I want to convey this proof to others. It's very hard to explain, it's like a thought with perception that does not care about empirical proof only the possibility in the absent of direct facts.
My thought see, therefore I accept.
To argue with someone is to argue in circles. I can't share my thoughts, because it's alien for them.
People combine things that ought to be separate, i.e. simplify it so much that it becomes false from my perspective (I can understand theirs). I never argue that that my way to see is the truth, only that the truth is not known and this perceptive is the other side of the coin.
It often ends with 'show me x or y or that it is the case that x or y ' which is impossible because the case or the fact does not necessarily exist, it's the logical possibility that 'x or y' could exist that exists logically and from that it could do so empirically (that which we don't know at this moment).
I don't know if I should just accept that this is the way I think and convey "knowledge" or If I can do something about it. We all want to be understood when we need to be.
tl;dr (but please read it) - How do you convey thoughts to others when you must* that are constantly misunderstood in its deepest meaning? (I don't know if this question makes sense to you, I hope it will.).
*assignments, life in general
This is a problem I fight with constantly. I have only recently started to analyze this problem. It seems to be that the logical possibility is enough for me, I don't need a direct proof, or it to be the case in a situation where you don't know what is the case (only the logical possibility that it could be the case is enough - it's a proof for me.) <--this is the problem, I want to convey this proof to others. It's very hard to explain, it's like a thought with perception that does not care about empirical proof only the possibility in the absent of direct facts.
My thought see, therefore I accept.
To argue with someone is to argue in circles. I can't share my thoughts, because it's alien for them.
People combine things that ought to be separate, i.e. simplify it so much that it becomes false from my perspective (I can understand theirs). I never argue that that my way to see is the truth, only that the truth is not known and this perceptive is the other side of the coin.
It often ends with 'show me x or y or that it is the case that x or y ' which is impossible because the case or the fact does not necessarily exist, it's the logical possibility that 'x or y' could exist that exists logically and from that it could do so empirically (that which we don't know at this moment).
I don't know if I should just accept that this is the way I think and convey "knowledge" or If I can do something about it. We all want to be understood when we need to be.
