I find I prefer Sx-seconders more than Sx-first as romantic partners. There's so much satisfaction in drawing out their Sx, and it leaves room for longing, which I ridiculously enjoy. That, and they have more of a 'grounding intensity' that both stimulates me emotionally and stabilizes me - and I need that stability.

The few Sx/So's I've met I found intoxicating, we ended up having the most fiery/tumultuous exchanges.

 

I said sx/sp but it also depends on their type for me. I don't know if I would like all sx types first. My friends are a mix.

My partner is actually so/sx and sometimes I wish he was sx first but overall we have a nice balance.

 

I have tended to be drawn to sp/sx. The aloofness intrigues me, and then once you're in with them, you're in deep. Its like a sx who takes longer to really dig you, but then they're less likely to just drop you for something else once you are finally there.

 

Are we talking romantically? Sx/sp and sx/so. Sx-doms are the most attractive to me. I've been attracted to other types in the past, but usually end up disillusioned by their reluctance to want to get close to me.

 

I am going with the wild and untamed Sx/So...

 

I only know one Sx/So, who I was intensely and immensely attracted to. I am fond of So/Sx's a lot too, and Sx/Sp seems very intriguing but I've never met one.

 

I always knew my deepest relationship was with an sp/sx, and the things I've been reading lately only confirm it. They're the only ones that, so far, have put up/helped with with my whacky re-inventing, and dissatisfactions with the present.

I'm her fucking almond tree. She prunes me every once in awhile to stay in check, and I provide experiences she wants to crack, but can't for the longest time. Gives me time to ruminate and find a new set of them.

 

bump!

 

Looking at my past relationships, Sx-first or second. With fellow Sexuals, things were more intense, but relationships with Sx-second people proved to last longer. With Sx-last... eh, like we belonged to different species or something.

 

I was ruminating through the past this weekend and I actually would bet that this one person I was involved with was sx/sp, so scratch what I said in my first post.

I was really young though and didn't know how to handle that kind of intimacy so I kept running from everything. But man, the chemistry was just so natural that I didn't even know what hit me until I started consciously thinking of it.. then consequentially started to deny it or got scared or whatever.

Sx-first, I think, are most emotionally satisfying and 'comfortable' for me, but that's a bit frightening in its own right, isn't it? I also think I'm finding So/Sx to be as equally attractive as Sx/So. They both make me feel insecure though because of how wide a range their associations with other people are.

 

I was ruminating through the past this weekend and I actually would bet that this one person I was involved with was sx/sp, so scratch what I said in my first post.

I was really young though and didn't know how to handle that kind of intimacy so I kept running from everything. But man, the chemistry was just so natural that I didn't even know what hit me until I started consciously thinking of it.. then consequentially started to deny it or got scared or whatever.

Sx/sps can find the intimacy intimidating and overwhelming at first, which is why many of them keep out of relationships in younger years. It becomes like self-punishment. Something you are starving without yet something that will flood you if you're given it.

 

I voted for Sx/So, most women that I am attracted to are SX/So and are quiet liberated and fun-loving I enjoy the company of other Sx/Sp's but I don't have a desire to date them. A nice Sx/So girl would do for me.

 

Um, @cyamitide, is there a Sx/So poll? I couldn't find it.

 

I just think I would be seriously unsatisfied and annoyingly emotionally needy if I were with anyone who's not a sexual-dominant. I'm magnetically attracted to them anyway. I don't think secondary matters to me.

 

I notice that the social energy is probably the best because its broad while my sx/sp energy only loops back to myself. Soc/Sx is good because they have that broadness but understand intensity too. I dont find sp energy all that attractive unless its sp/sx but I really dont like sp energy that much, even though I have it second, I don't focus on it that much because its all directed toward my sexual energy. I voted soc/sx.

 

I dont find sp energy all that attractive unless its sp/sx but I really dont like sp energy that much, even though I have it second, I don't focus on it that much because its all directed toward my sexual energy. I voted soc/sx.

For sx/sp it's easier to bond to sp/so on friendship level, but building a relationship I don't think sx/sp really knows how to engage sp/so. They are responsive to calls for domesticity and settling down, while sx/sp is like a wandering gypsy.

 

Also, I wouldnt want another sx/sp because I'm extremely demanding in my interactions with people and I need someone to be the "host", Im more of the "tick" if you get what I mean. So again thats why I would pick soc/sx or maybe even soc/sp because they could supply my endless need for social stimulation. Soc/sx is ideal though bc soc/sp is maybe a little too comfortable in groups while soc/sx likes a couple people sprinkled around, I wouldnt have to worry about being left behind.

 

I really like sp/so's. They're all down-to-earth and reliable and shit, and I'm not. DO MY TAXES!!!!

Also so/sx, but they're a bit too flighty when they're around my age of 19/20.

 

I'm a fan of sp-lasters. sx/sp can get too brooding and intense, but so/sx and sx/so can allow it out.