Hi! I'm stopping by here to share a test I made recently for both MBTI and the cognitive functions. The test has 106 (105 actually since one of them is a dud) questions that assess your scores using three different methods: a Grant/Brownsword-based algorithm, an axis-based algorithm, and a separate method altogether that uses a different collection of values to try and guess your Myers-Briggs type.
My Grant/Brownsword algorithm is contingent upon both an alternating I/E model along with the idea that you develop your functions through aging and assumes that your inferior function is undeveloped (though Brownsword stresses the idea of it coming out during stress, which isn't really accounted for on the test). The definitions I use for the functions belong to neither Grant nor Brownsword, however, and are more so based around my own observation of how the functions are generally* perceived by people when they are used to type characters in MBTI.
My axis-based algorithm assumes that you favor a particular stack in which two different axes are preferred over their respective opposites (e.g. Se/Ni vs Ne/Si) and also assumes that your four functions (a la Grant) are "developed" to begin with.
The third method of scoring types you using Myers-Briggs letters, with all of the test's questions having been assigned eight values with varying strengths along with the functions that they're meant to correspond to. If you're specifically looking for your Myers-Briggs type, I would recommend that this is the result you pay most attention to.
Thank you!!!! I hope y'all enjoy…
http://sakinorva.net/functions.php
My Grant/Brownsword algorithm is contingent upon both an alternating I/E model along with the idea that you develop your functions through aging and assumes that your inferior function is undeveloped (though Brownsword stresses the idea of it coming out during stress, which isn't really accounted for on the test). The definitions I use for the functions belong to neither Grant nor Brownsword, however, and are more so based around my own observation of how the functions are generally* perceived by people when they are used to type characters in MBTI.
My axis-based algorithm assumes that you favor a particular stack in which two different axes are preferred over their respective opposites (e.g. Se/Ni vs Ne/Si) and also assumes that your four functions (a la Grant) are "developed" to begin with.
The third method of scoring types you using Myers-Briggs letters, with all of the test's questions having been assigned eight values with varying strengths along with the functions that they're meant to correspond to. If you're specifically looking for your Myers-Briggs type, I would recommend that this is the result you pay most attention to.
Thank you!!!! I hope y'all enjoy…
http://sakinorva.net/functions.php
